05-22-2014, 07:57 AM
I might have condensed and molded it too much to make sense without being like-minded, sorry about that.
When you distrust your mind, perceiving using raw logic for interpretation and perceiving through a filter of conditioning (logic for the benefit of sanity) can feel like being different persons (or a state or being outside of your control, this is the "it").
When you distrust your mind, conclusions based on less input appear superior to those on more input, as the latter allows for more errors.
Because when you distrust your mind, you distrust the mechanism feeding observations to your consciousness.
I intended to describe the thoughts of a person having trouble dealing with reality, having learned himself coping techniques that make reality rationalizations. The story is set against a railway crossing.
I apparently failed. I dislike failure so I will try again, insights are much appreciated.
EDIT: Admittedly "it is deduced" is an anomaly, "it deduces" would be more appropriate.
When you distrust your mind, perceiving using raw logic for interpretation and perceiving through a filter of conditioning (logic for the benefit of sanity) can feel like being different persons (or a state or being outside of your control, this is the "it").
When you distrust your mind, conclusions based on less input appear superior to those on more input, as the latter allows for more errors.
Because when you distrust your mind, you distrust the mechanism feeding observations to your consciousness.
I intended to describe the thoughts of a person having trouble dealing with reality, having learned himself coping techniques that make reality rationalizations. The story is set against a railway crossing.
I apparently failed. I dislike failure so I will try again, insights are much appreciated.
EDIT: Admittedly "it is deduced" is an anomaly, "it deduces" would be more appropriate.