01-07-2012, 08:48 AM
It's quite true that if I read another "he soared too high and his wings caught on fire" reference I may just puke 

It could be worse
|
Askew
|
|
01-07-2012, 08:48 AM
It's quite true that if I read another "he soared too high and his wings caught on fire" reference I may just puke
![]()
It could be worse
01-07-2012, 12:53 PM
You're completely correct. I have this delusion that since I spent all these years in school studying this stuff I should pass it on. It completely belies the fact that no one cares about that sort of thing. If you want to be popular among English professors, and get ask out of cordials, just fain interest in such things as literary criticism, or better yet, the history of!
I think I had no less than 3 teachers teach the "Daedalus incredibly stupid son myth" in widely disparate classes. It is probably the most overly used myth in English. I guess it is because it appears so accessible, and taps into that flight/freedom/hubris archetype it is irresistible. Besides all those sophomoric writers have little knowledge to pull from in that first mo0ment of enlightenment. The classes were, the pre-Socratics, Greek Dramatist, Greek Mythology. ![]() Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
01-09-2012, 03:09 PM
Hi Dale, I guess their lyrical wax melted........
Oh what a wicket web we weave!
01-09-2012, 07:51 PM
Not for lack of trying my friend, not for lack of trying.
Certainly to their own ear waxed lyrical, they. "Iamb what Iamb" Now that's funny. Just don't bring that anapest around, Whimpy, who likes ground round, but Tuesday's never there to pay on when he has money. Trochee! Et tu, Blutus Jeep, jeep, Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
01-10-2012, 07:12 AM
(01-09-2012, 07:51 PM)Erthona Wrote: Not for lack of trying my friend, not for lack of trying. Ear, ear oyle go along with that, be a wimp if oy didn't, life's just so much spinach you know! ![]()
Oh what a wicket web we weave!
01-10-2012, 08:19 AM
Hi Leanne,
I've looked at this poem off-and-on since you posted it, but haven't had the time due to family and holidays to give it the attention it deserved. Forgive me, I haven't read the thread through so if I comment on some aspect of the poem you've already discussed I apologize for any redundancy. I like the title quite a bit oddly perhaps what I like the most about it is that it rhymes with L2. While this may be gimmicky, I almost hoped you would add some slant rhymes to play off the title. Let's go through the lines: (12-28-2011, 03:09 PM)Leanne Wrote: Sometimes I tilt my head to the sideI felt a little all over the place with that critique. Hopefully, you'll get something out of it. Best, Todd
The secret of poetry is cruelty.--Jon Anderson
01-10-2012, 08:40 AM
Todd, thank you, I've got loads of changes to make now and am very happy
![]() Your reading of the first stanza reminded me of exactly what I was thinking when I wrote this -- it was a little while ago now but you're so completely right about that! Will post the revision forthwith, many thanks.
It could be worse
01-10-2012, 08:47 AM
I haven't changed the Lethe part -- I think it's more insidious that "they know not what they do". There are people who will strike in just this fashion time and again, seemingly with no memory of the hurt they caused the last time -- or perhaps it's less memory, than simply not being able to conceive of a view other than their own, or that their "advice" might be received with anything other than fawning gratitude.
It could be worse
in general, comments in the poetry threads should be about the poem in the first post.
if it looks like something needs discussing which doesn't or won't help the poet with the poem posted in the first post, create a thread in the poetry discussion forum with an url leading back to the thread where the seed was born. sometimes dissecting a point of a poem with other critics has little to do with said poem and very soon wanders so far away from the poem that the poem is forgotten and thread's intent is changed beyond recognition. normally i'd say "keep it to the poem and interact with the poet not other cirtics/admin" the above should have been pointed out after the first query or the 2nd off topic post. we're not being heavy with this method of moderation, we're just trying to make sure a poem isn't being buried under stuff that would work better in the poetry discussion forum. the poetry threads are for posting poetry and for response between critic and poet. should it arise that a critic wishes to ask another critic or poets in general a question, please do so in the discussion forum and open the subject up to it widest audience, no warnings were given in the making of this post and no poets were terribly hurt ![]() stay on topic/mod
01-11-2012, 01:20 AM
Hi Leanne,
I've read this one quite a few times, but avoided the comments entirely because I'm trying to find it for myself. My level of success is admittedly low, but I still want to give you my thoughts as you may benefit from the viewpoint of total idiots that read your work :p (12-28-2011, 03:09 PM)Leanne Wrote: Revision 10/01/12 I'm sure I've missed a lot of this, but I'm still reading it- which in itself is a tribute because I have the attention span of a mosquito :p Thanks for sharing Leanne.
01-11-2012, 02:08 AM
(12-28-2011, 03:09 PM)Leanne Wrote: Revision 10/01/12not much of an edit but the revision for me is better. i found it to carry a bit of baggage that took away from the piece. in the 1st stabza i'm at odds as to how to view the sleeve, is it carried dick dastardly like in front of his eyes? some of the 'I's' i think could be done away with. i was unsure of the use of the lethe at first but after a few reads i think it works, it adds a certain persona to the other person. it reads well. the last line "underground" didn't add anything for me, lethe was reference enough to the underground/world. i think the penultimate line would be a great finish, it would leave me on the edge. jmo as always, thanks for the read ![]()
Billy, many thanks.
I had to get rid of "fangs" when Ray mentioned Twilight ... anything fanglike has been appropriated by the teenies these days!I don't think of sleeve as something that just goes over an arm. It's something that fits closely, like the sleeve of a record, or a sleeve in an engine. The cloth case I keep my iPod in is a sleeve (in my head at least). Unfortunately, the answer to all your "is this needed?" queries is, at least at the moment, yes. Thanks for taking a look. (01-11-2012, 01:20 AM)Mark Wrote: I don't get how someone can leave footprints with YOUR shoesTodd pretty much nailed the meaning there. You've heard "walk a mile in my shoes"? Well, there are people who will take your experiences out of context, or your words, and superimpose them on their own so that they are certain they know exactly what you mean, but you'd never have thought of their interpretation. To most people, that discrepancy is ok and can be lived with, but to some it's inconceivable that their ideas don't match up with everyone else's. Those are the people who do the most damage, in my opinion. (01-11-2012, 01:20 AM)Mark Wrote: I don't know the intent here, but it makes me think of the old 'does this dress make me look fat?' question.There might be an element of that as well . But on the whole, it's more like these are my faults and scars, if you try healing them you'll destroy me.(01-11-2012, 01:20 AM)Mark Wrote: I hear a lot of eyes being scaled. Is there another way to say it? And does it need to be scaled AND dark?If it's scaled at all, then I'd say it needs scaled AND dark -- but I'll think on the scaled. Thanks Mark
It could be worse
01-11-2012, 11:06 AM
This revision reads more clearly to me, especially the first three stanzas.
Hate to disagree with Billy, "but fragmented honesty" seems one of the best lines in the poem, and really puts in clear relief what is being juxtaposed: wholeness--honesty A poet comes to the truth through self honesty, and self honesty through a deflation of the ego. Deflating the ego leaves scars on our psyche from admitting the stupidity, and foolishness of our actions, and the idiocy of cherished beliefs. These are the sacrifices required to reach greater levels of self honest. Self-centeredness and egoism must be pushed aside, at least temporarily, if we are going to come to an awareness of the truth. The person who would heal us, haven't a clue what they are trying to do. This is in addition to the fact that they are not doing for us, but for themselves, because these things make them uncomfortable. It is fear being practiced under the guise of kindness, and there is no consideration given to the thought of whether or not this "healing" will be beneficial to the one receiving it. It should be noted that manslaughter still carries with it a penalty despite the fact that the action was unintended. Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
01-11-2012, 11:11 AM
My thoughts pretty much exactly, Dale
It's an idea I've explored many times and one I really didn't understand until just a few years ago, when I met a certain Scotsman. I have a sonnet that perhaps works better, I will post it in Misc as it doesn't really need workshopping.
It could be worse
01-11-2012, 02:32 PM
Look forward to it.
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
01-11-2012, 11:13 PM
(01-11-2012, 11:06 AM)Erthona Wrote: This revision reads more clearly to me, especially the first three stanzas.it's good that people disagree, specially for the poet, it makes them think, (i think) back on topic, i see where you're going with sleeve now you mention it. and i should have understood without being told. thanks for the clarification
01-12-2012, 04:54 AM
It's great that people disagree -- every time someone mentions something I hadn't thought of, I take a good look at it from all angles and decide whether to use it, amend it or discard it entirely, but the fact is that it's making me look things critically, from someone else's perspective. That's the true value of workshopping, and I thank you.
It could be worse
01-12-2012, 08:08 AM
I like most of the revisions. I tried to read this through as though I were reading it for the first time and found a few real and/or imaginative concerns (which may be because I'm really hungry because I'm trying to wait to eat until my wife gets home and the cats are starting to look like chicken to me [of course, I look like chicken to the cats all the time]). Askew - rev 10/01/12 Sometimes I tilt my head to the side and cross-eyed, try to imagine your view through that close woven canvas you wear as your gray-shadowed sleeve <- No problems here, just wanted to say that this whole stanza's a hoot: "To see your vision of the world all I have to do is tilt my head, cross my eyes, and put a bag over my head I can’t find the itch that straddles my back, though I seek it in your blank stare and scratch with the barbs that ride <- DO like 'barbs' upon your tepid breath <- But still dislike this line. 'Hide within'? Can 'barbs' ride something that's tepid/lukewarm/milk-warm? Or maybe they're the passive-aggressive barbs of indifference/neglect? I know the blood has been freed from my skin by the footprints you leave with my shoes as you waltz carefree into the cave to drink from the Lethe once more <- Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Lethe I stand before the mirror and you try to suture my skin to my bloodied clothes, not realising that it is not wholeness I desire, but fragmented honesty <- Oh, jeez, I liked this so plusmuch before but now it reads like "failed honesty". To me it used to mean that I'd rather be honest in pieces than a glued-together fake. Maybe there's a problem with "wholeness" being too positive, that there's not a modifier stressing that the "wholeness" is just a facade. Whatever, maybe my brain just farted and it's all just fine. ![]() Sometimes I wonder if I’d be happier like this, with my eyes pleasantly scaled and dark and no questing blades to score my flesh with lines not parallel like yours but I don’t think I can breathe <- reads awkwardly because I underground unconsciously want to stress the second 'I' instead of the 'can' which causes a stumble if I'm reading it for the first time. - - -
a brightly colored fungus that grows in bark inclusions
Ray, thanks, thinking your comments over for now... but the last one seems odd to me because when I read it aloud, I don't stress "can" at all -- I read it as:
but i DON'T/ think i can BREATHE or at a pinch, I can stretch it to iambs I guess, as long as there's an anapaest to start: but i DON'T/ think I/ can BREATHE then an anapaest for "underGROUND" to close on a strong stress. To me it's the "breathe" that's important, maybe I should record it and see how it sounds.
It could be worse
01-12-2012, 10:00 AM
Even though you have, despite all, 'given the game away' a little, I shall choose (as a space) to see it the way I prefer. As scriptor, we have already established that you are powerless.
First, as there was a lot of talk about meaning, before the censors stepped in, I have read this, just as I would listen to some instrumental music, whether Bartok, Albinoni, or Britten. There is no purpose in asking oneself wtf does it mean in those cases-- yet, people the world over get something from it. Likewise, I should not stare at a work by,say, Ben Nicholson and ask the same question. With poetry, because of its nature, I have a choice. Second, I liked the tone. How casual it was, lazy, conversational! Surely not pent-up rage, or anything of that sort --no, no. But, over-arching, perhaps, maybe, stuff which y--I mean, the scriptor, does not want to dig out, perhaps even scriptors have recesses, which they themselves are unaware of, while being all too aware of plenty. Yet, mainly, just the tone: no good reason. Third, I read a number of times, and was most satisfied by just allowing it to hang, as the Arabs would say, and frequently did, like a necklace. On this necklace, are gems (pearls usually) which for me were the beginning lines: tilting and so on; the barbs of s.2, and the first two lines especially of s.3, the blood and implicit pain. (Waltz, maybe a bit cultural. For me, it smacked of cliche, as in " You come waltzing in here and think you can tell me what to do" and I wondered why Lethe needed an article; Keats did not bother his arse with one). Next gems on this particular 'unique necklace' are the mirror line, the suture and bloodied clothes line, no-one can gainsay that. No-one! It is an absolute! And finally, where I might have been tempted to finish, the 'fragmented honesty'. Fourthly: so much for my approach, tone, and the gems. What might they add up to? There is blood, and pain; and a back too. It is not just in the mad Middle East that people thrash themselves till blood pours out, eg at Ashura, in memory of Ali; the Muslims, who adopted these ways first, were those who had conquered the old Persian lands, and there, Dualism was the religion, namely, Zoroastrianism. The great divide between the super spiritual, and the orthodox, replicates everywhere. So later we find Spanish mystics knocking seven bells out of themselves, just like some of their Muslim cousins. One always wonders just what the mix of sex, and religious fervour truly is-- but it surely goes with guilt. And with guilt goes secrets, or the divulging of secrets, and a preference for not digging up the past, in case of what one may find. A mirror may be a hateful thing, and the more so, if someone else is in that mirror -- but it may also be redemption, a final finding of honesty, after so many hidings away; even if, it cannot be a complete, frank and open honesty, but a fragmented one. The scriptor is not, of course, obliged to comment!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|