Posts: 2,357
Threads: 230
Joined: Oct 2010
Interesting. Just think if I'd given you something more to work with.
As far as the weak/strong thing goes its largely subjective I'm guessing.
If I actually try to fix this, the challenge will be fitting the rhythm in in a way that doesn't torture the syntax--not a concern I had a few decades ago
The secret of poetry is cruelty.--Jon Anderson
Posts: 1,827
Threads: 305
Joined: Dec 2016
"As far as the weak/strong thing goes its largely subjective I'm guessing."
I think on ending lines it is less subjective as there are very obvious technical things one can point to. Opening lines are more difficult because it depends on how the poem is going to unfold. But unless you meant rhythmically when saying the first line is weak, I think you are inaccurate. If it were a weak line content-wise, you wouldn't have gotten all this interest about seeing the rest of the poem look liked.
Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
Posts: 2,357
Threads: 230
Joined: Oct 2010
I'm talking more about content. I take each line independently before looking at them as joint units. If I'd simply posted the first line I'd have gotten no interest.
She was old and feeble
To me that is a static weak line, again I see that as a largely subjective argument. Different writers have different hot buttons when they create something.
The secret of poetry is cruelty.--Jon Anderson
Posts: 1,827
Threads: 305
Joined: Dec 2016
When you say "static and weak", are you meaning uninteresting? Because I don't think it is a static line. You say,
"She was old and feeble..."
and I want to say, "and...?"
But you can always spice it up by going to
She was infirmed and decrepit
You can get overly cutesy as well as alliterative with
"a seasoned, senile, senior"
Whatever, just find you some synonyms that you like and put them in there instead.
However, the point to me is, this is not the point of emphasis, it is simply a terse statement that adequately describes "her" so you can get to the part that is the meat of the line. Plus by not making it cute, dynamic or involved, it makes it easier to juxtapose against the pushed her down the stairs, thus eliciting that voyeuristic reaction you saw from everybody. What makes music is both the pitched tones, and the pauses in between. That part of the line needs to be an adequate "foil" to the other part, the Dr. Watson, to Holmes. I'm the first to rail against cliche, and trite phrases, but in some cases such as this, worn and familiar serves the best.
That's my take anyway!
Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.