the trouble with any data, vid or other is this. the commentary on them can and often is slanted one way or the other.
for instance play a vid with the omen theme tune and you think of sinister before you even see a frame
because someone says there is no other explanation for a phenomenon in a vid doesn't mean they're right.
often the person who says....there is no other possible explanation is the person with the closed mindset. i've seen on nat geo a perfectly good example why the face is a natural phenom. i've also seen many occasions in nature when a geometrical shape has formed what people fail to realize is this. most of our geometrical shapes were taken from nature. we then formulated theory as to why they occur and when they would occur. the ration of the segments in a nautilus shell gave us the perfect mean aka golden mean aka Fibonacci's raitio. it's how the got most of the measurements for the parthenon. and many famous buildings. it can be used to deconstruct the human body. squares and the this could never happen in nature pyramids occour all the time. hexagonls also occur all the time in nature. just look at the giants causeway as 1 example. intersperse any or all of the above with shadow, distance, height etc and you can come up with some crazy shit.
the scull o mars is a rock formation which is extremely small. that particular picture is a blown up section of a particular picture. i can't find the sauce but i have seen the pic, call me a liar if you must.
when we're shown the pics (vids) we have no real point of reference. no ruler to measure. they say on one this must be a canopy higher than the ground because of the shadow. well that word "must" isn't as true as they say. it may be this or that but it can be other things. often the most plausible is true. it isn't plausible to say this pattern is a real face or this isn't made in nature. if i'm shown an egg shell magnified a hundred times i guarantee i can show you pictures of things that are man size.
for me what i saw was rhetorical bullshit. that's my opinion, it may not be right but it is mine.
on pluto
we have proof of water. but how can we have proof from just a simple picture like this? we cant can we
we can't gain anything. we can say ooh look at the cloudy bits, something must live there but it doesn't