03-31-2017, 02:37 PM
Hi Lizzie,
I dropped off in the editing process somewhere. Let me address the new revision. What stands out to me most now isn't so much the imagination of childhood but the passive voice (I'm not actually criticizing it) and how it evokes more loneliness and isolation for me. When I first read this I took away playfulness and imagination. That isn't my main takeaway now.
I hope the comments bring clarity or help in some way. I think I like the poem much better than I originally did.
Best,
Todd
I dropped off in the editing process somewhere. Let me address the new revision. What stands out to me most now isn't so much the imagination of childhood but the passive voice (I'm not actually criticizing it) and how it evokes more loneliness and isolation for me. When I first read this I took away playfulness and imagination. That isn't my main takeaway now.
(06-20-2016, 04:23 PM)Lizzie Wrote: Edit 3I read this now as quite sad. It wasn't my first take at all.
Through afternoon light,
the white wardrobe played
hide-and-seek with me as I climbed--The object is the companion. Yes there is the active I climbed but it takes a bit to get there. It just seems to emphasize that the speaker is alone.
in and out. A water-filled baton
spun me until I felt weightless
as the purple glitter inside.--I still get a playful read and I like all the lines. Just a new feeling this time through.
The concrete jungle-gym--I think this is a clever reimagining of the near cliche
lifted me on its shoulders--the playground equipment acts as surrogate parent.
and we saw a playground
with children erased.--I see this was in later revisions and not the original. It is a true emphasis on the need of the speaker for friends and a lack of them. This feels almost an adult understand of what child could only grasp emotionally at the edges.
My brother disappeared
with the moon each morning--the moon gives me both a sense of time (still night) and a potential madness implication.
and mom did dishes in silence.--stoic coping
She was a tree whose leaves were green
only at the very top.--the image serves much better without the original mention of inaccessibility. It still conveys this. It also conveys that life or vibrancy was absent in the home. It was something the mother couldn't share--so the speaker had to substitute with whitewashed props, plastic and glitter and concrete. There was imagination but it wasn't a fertile field.
I hope the comments bring clarity or help in some way. I think I like the poem much better than I originally did.
Best,
Todd
The secret of poetry is cruelty.--Jon Anderson


Thanks for stopping by.
