PLUMBING THE SOUL
#1
 Plumbing the Soul
 
Makeup, hair, lipstick
cannot hide
a linebacker body
clear thinkers
understood

long ago
and cared not –

if-if
joined
by such
in a public toilet

as it is called
in civilized places.
 
But let it be
a Men’s, Women’s,
Ladies, Gent’s,
Powder or
Rest Room
and
all changes.

 
The inescapable
shame
that keeps humans
from being
kings of all
is that they
and beasts both
produce waste.
 
That shame
unites
men and women
in public toilets,

where they are
close in kinship as
animals.
Higher,

though still animals.
 
 Cloistered apart
in Ladies, Gents,
Men’s, Women’s,
Powder,
Rest

Rooms
to commit their
humiliating deeds,
humanity’s
natural duets
are divided

into
We and

They.
 
But where are
remade folk,
not born

We or They
to go?

 
Easy for those
living among
clear thinkers:
public toilets
where each stall
conceals all.
 
No need to
create a
support community
because it takes only
one to poop,
shake or wipe
a pee
in privacy.
 
What matters is
soul,
not
personal plumbing’s

use or change
or whether it
and owner
agree
on who to be.
 
Once that’s
understood,

live your life,
let others
live theirs.
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reply
#2
(10-06-2016, 05:34 AM)zorcas Wrote:   Plumbing the Soul
 
Makeup, hair, lipstick
cannot hide
a linebacker body punctuation here?
clear thinkers
understood

long ago
and cared not –

if-if   don't understand this split
joined
by such
in a public toilet

as it is called
in civilized places.
 
But let it be
a Men’s, Women’s,
Ladies, Gent’s,
Powder or
Rest Room
and
all changes.

 
The inescapable
shame
that keeps humans
from being
kings of all
is that they
and beasts both
produce waste.  Just because I disagree doesn't mean it's wrong.  You could be working with Disney.
 
That shame
unites
men and women
in public toilets,

where they are
close in kinship as
animals.
Higher,

though still animals. Relevant in today's gender issues, but this last sentence seems redundant and too short at the same time.
 
 Cloistered apart
in Ladies, Gents,
Men’s, Women’s,
Powder,
Rest

Rooms nice repetition
to commit their
humiliating deeds,
humanity’s
natural duets
are divided

into
We and

They.  We the people? They something else?
 
But where are
remade folk,
not born

We or They how about quotations around the we and they to help with sentence flow, 
to go?  To go poop?

 
Easy for those
living among
clear thinkers:
public toilets
where each stall
conceals all. Reminds me of military where you're outside on a bucket looking at each other 
 
No need to
create a
support community
because it takes only
one to poop,
shake or wipe
a pee
in privacy. Considering age and handicap
 
What matters is
soul,
not
personal plumbing’s

use or change
or whether it
and owner
agree
on who to be. You are what you eat, therefore what you poop.
 
Once that’s
understood,

live your life,
let others
live theirs.  Right? We don't  criticize each other's poop methods, we shouldn't criticize anything


All the line breaks make me think you want each or every other word considered in an overall analysis (analyzing because that's what readers do, not to Crack your pot) which is excruciating, like a slow poop you've been working on for twenty minutes or so.  I think if you wrote it out line for line, sentence for sentence, you'd be able to make each sentence that more effective in its own right, then split it up like rabbit pellets cause you didn't eat a whOle lot that day, but still enough to feel relieved.  I always have someone look at my poop for abnormalities, or sheer size, or the paint job...
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Peanut butter honey banana sandwiches
Reply
#3
Good points which  will be addressed, though you concentrate on poop, grossly neglecting pee which we used to aim into mortar round tubes. Have also considered introducing into the poem the truth that women, if they weren't so narrow minded and ignorant, could use urinals just the way men do.

 Decided the thing isn't really worth repairing, especially since in today's poetic world with its endless gobs of personal stories and slices of life more of a pick-me-up poem is needed and herewith supplied.

Excretia Borgia
 
Long before Darwin wrote                                                                
Origin of the Species
humans had a thousand
names for almost any species’ feces,
from crap and scat
to the present tense of shat.
 
But excluding
blood, sweat and tears,
no one ever wrote
of that expelled by all,
from darling daughters
to drunks and druids,
meaning, of course,
body fluids.
 
Why, may one ask of thee,
 have we only
 that pair so lonely,
 piss and pee?
 
Though tinkle adds a wrinkle,
being a girl verb not a noun,
it’s undoable in pants
but quite easy from a gown.
 
But perhaps we’ll outgrow
this linguistic paralysis
when a transsexualizing
surgeon
tells two happily rebuilt
patients,
“Those are urinalysis’
discarded phalluses.”
Reply
#4
Zorcas said:
Quote: Decided the thing isn't really worth repairing.

Based on the above statement and the second poem added I moved this thread out of a workshop. If I've misread you just let me know/ella
billy wrote:welcome to the site. make it your own, wear it like a well loved slipper and wear it out. ella pleads:please click forum titles for posting guidelines, important threads. New poet? Try Poetic DevicesandWard's Tips

Reply
#5
(10-06-2016, 08:34 AM)zorcas Wrote:  Good points which  will be addressed, though you concentrate on poop, grossly neglecting pee which we used to aim into mortar round tubes. Have also considered introducing into the poem the truth that women, if they weren't so narrow minded and ignorant, could use urinals just the way men do.

 Decided the thing isn't really worth repairing, especially since in today's poetic world with its endless gobs of personal stories and slices of life more of a pick-me-up poem is needed and herewith supplied.

Excretia Borgia
 
Long before Darwin wrote                                                                
Origin of the Species
humans had a thousand
names for almost any species’ feces,
from crap and scat
to the present tense of shat.
 
But excluding
blood, sweat and tears,
no one ever wrote
of that expelled by all,
from darling daughters
to drunks and druids,
meaning, of course,
body fluids.
 
Why, may one ask of thee,
 have we only
 that pair so lonely,
 piss and pee?
 
Though tinkle adds a wrinkle,
being a girl verb not a noun,
it’s undoable in pants
but quite easy from a gown.
 
But perhaps we’ll outgrow
this linguistic paralysis
when a transsexualizing
surgeon
tells two happily rebuilt
patients,
“Those are urinalysis’
discarded phalluses.”

I must disagree
That pee has one synonym -
I've heard "piddle" and "wee"
and "he's micturating merrily
on his mate who's passed out, good on him"
more often than I'd care to recall.
But your gall to post on 'Serious' then drain your dragon,
wet the lily pad, empty your flagon,
and essentially to have trollery drag on
is amusing to me.
~ I think I just quoted myself - Achebe
Reply
#6
(10-06-2016, 10:14 AM)Achebe Wrote:  
(10-06-2016, 08:34 AM)zorcas Wrote:  Good points which  will be addressed, though you concentrate on poop, grossly neglecting pee which we used to aim into mortar round tubes. Have also considered introducing into the poem the truth that women, if they weren't so narrow minded and ignorant, could use urinals just the way men do.

 Decided the thing isn't really worth repairing, especially since in today's poetic world with its endless gobs of personal stories and slices of life more of a pick-me-up poem is needed and herewith supplied.

Excretia Borgia
 
Long before Darwin wrote                                                                
Origin of the Species
humans had a thousand
names for almost any species’ feces,
from crap and scat
to the present tense of shat.
 
But excluding
blood, sweat and tears,
no one ever wrote
of that expelled by all,
from darling daughters
to drunks and druids,
meaning, of course,
body fluids.
 
Why, may one ask of thee,
 have we only
 that pair so lonely,
 piss and pee?
 
Though tinkle adds a wrinkle,
being a girl verb not a noun,
it’s undoable in pants
but quite easy from a gown.
 
But perhaps we’ll outgrow
this linguistic paralysis
when a transsexualizing
surgeon
tells two happily rebuilt
patients,
“Those are urinalysis’
discarded phalluses.”

I must disagree
That pee has one synonym -
I've heard "piddle" and "wee"
and "he's micturating merrily
on his mate who's passed out, good on him"
more often than I'd care to recall.
But your gall to post on 'Serious' then drain your dragon,
wet the lily pad, empty your flagon,
and essentially to have trollery drag on
is amusing to me.

You forgot "urination" in response to America's question: "What am I?", its answer arrived at through the process of elimination. Wee and piddle, admittedly, are part of the vocabulary, but I used Harnischphaeger's word frequency analysis chart to determine the most common terms for a poem while leaving out mathematical ones like Number One and Number Two. You should not be amused as much as  bemused, if not abused. We poetizers are a delicate lot, especially when our poems go to pot.
Two.
Reply
#7
(10-06-2016, 10:41 AM)zorcas Wrote:  
(10-06-2016, 10:14 AM)Achebe Wrote:  
(10-06-2016, 08:34 AM)zorcas Wrote:  Good points which  will be addressed, though you concentrate on poop, grossly neglecting pee which we used to aim into mortar round tubes. Have also considered introducing into the poem the truth that women, if they weren't so narrow minded and ignorant, could use urinals just the way men do.

 Decided the thing isn't really worth repairing, especially since in today's poetic world with its endless gobs of personal stories and slices of life more of a pick-me-up poem is needed and herewith supplied.

Excretia Borgia
 
Long before Darwin wrote                                                                
Origin of the Species
humans had a thousand
names for almost any species’ feces,
from crap and scat
to the present tense of shat.
 
But excluding
blood, sweat and tears,
no one ever wrote
of that expelled by all,
from darling daughters
to drunks and druids,
meaning, of course,
body fluids.
 
Why, may one ask of thee,
 have we only
 that pair so lonely,
 piss and pee?
 
Though tinkle adds a wrinkle,
being a girl verb not a noun,
it’s undoable in pants
but quite easy from a gown.
 
But perhaps we’ll outgrow
this linguistic paralysis
when a transsexualizing
surgeon
tells two happily rebuilt
patients,
“Those are urinalysis’
discarded phalluses.”

I must disagree
That pee has one synonym -
I've heard "piddle" and "wee"
and "he's micturating merrily
on his mate who's passed out, good on him"
more often than I'd care to recall.
But your gall to post on 'Serious' then drain your dragon,
wet the lily pad, empty your flagon,
and essentially to have trollery drag on
is amusing to me.

You forgot "urination" in response to America's question: "What am I?", its answer arrived at through the process of elimination. Wee and piddle, admittedly, are part of the vocabulary, but I used Harnischphaeger's word frequency analysis chart to determine the most common terms for a poem while leaving out mathematical ones like Number One and Number Two. You should not be amused as much as  bemused, if not abused. We poetizers are a delicate lot, especially when our poems go to pot.
Two.

I didn't quite forget it as let it be, the wealth of substitutes proving too many to repeat and prove an already proven point; as if by such proving they'd anoint me crown prince of internet debates with some degenerate sitting on a crapper, with poems best written on toilet paper for the wiping pleasure of various bums black and white. Not out of spite, but a respect for the art of poetry.  But I don't quite see why one such as he would post on Serious, a forum so straight it's barred to the bi-curious, unless the whole idea was to create a shitstorm of doggerel dressed as rhyme, which in Dante's time would have got the perpetrators right to the rack. I hope he's watching his back, the hack.
~ I think I just quoted myself - Achebe
Reply
#8
To take a whiz, to have a slash,
to gravely irritate one's rash,
to break the seal, to drain the vein,
to say goodbye to one's champagne --
be it from a lad or lass,
just save me some, I'll bring my glass.
It could be worse
Reply
#9
(10-06-2016, 11:49 AM)Achebe Wrote:  
(10-06-2016, 10:41 AM)zorcas Wrote:  
(10-06-2016, 10:14 AM)Achebe Wrote:  I must disagree
That pee has one synonym -
I've heard "piddle" and "wee"
and "he's micturating merrily
on his mate who's passed out, good on him"
more often than I'd care to recall.
But your gall to post on 'Serious' then drain your dragon,
wet the lily pad, empty your flagon,
and essentially to have trollery drag on
is amusing to me.

You forgot "urination" in response to America's question: "What am I?", its answer arrived at through the process of elimination. Wee and piddle, admittedly, are part of the vocabulary, but I used Harnischphaeger's word frequency analysis chart to determine the most common terms for a poem while leaving out mathematical ones like Number One and Number Two. You should not be amused as much as  bemused, if not abused. We poetizers are a delicate lot, especially when our poems go to pot.
Two.

I didn't quite forget it as let it be, the wealth of substitutes proving too many to repeat and prove an already proven point; as if by such proving they'd anoint me crown prince of internet debates with some degenerate sitting on a crapper, with poems best written on toilet paper for the wiping pleasure of various bums black and white. Not out of spite, but a respect for the art of poetry.  But I don't quite see why one such as he would post on Serious, a forum so straight it's barred to the bi-curious, unless the whole idea was to create a shitstorm of doggerel dressed as rhyme, which in Dante's time would have got the perpetrators right to the rack. I hope he's watching his back, the hack.
Are you related to the novelist from Niger? You crave a champagne?  Try this:
 
Uncorking Champagne
 
Like denuding
a fridge fugitive avocado,
peel away the glistening foil.
Admire the wire cage
in which the cork
is held captive,
wishing for freedom.
It's yours to give
using a fine linen towel
from Harding & Groves ($65).

Remove cork's iron mask,
placing towel carefully
on its bare Portuguese head.
Imagine Mother Teresa's shawl
as you wrap it around once
to look like Lawrence of Arabia's
ghutra flapping in a hot desert wind.

One hand tight on bottle's throat,
the other circling the shrouded cork,
sharply twist it to and fro.
( Two to's, three fro's works best.)

Bang!
Your task is done,
bubbly champagne
foaming like a wild dogwood
as it rinses you
from hand to elbow.

$75 for bottle and bubbles,
10 cents for the grapes.
Nothing for your troubles.


Shame! You cite doggerel but flea lion-like avoid that other sublime verse: catterel. I went to Serious hoping to avoid the worst;  it seems I have failed.
Reply
#10
        Catterel:

        An androgynous cat, quite self-centered,
        No end of confusion engendered:
        "If you call me a 'he',
        I'll insist I'm a 'she';
        I just won't be grammatic'ly gendered."

                                                                                                                a brightly colored fungus that grows in bark inclusions
Reply
#11
I guess you could just call her 'they'
no gender implied - so 'they' say
but the tone of the note
can imply sex - a boat
is a 'she' and a 'her', Hemingway.
Reply
#12
(10-06-2016, 05:34 AM)zorcas Wrote:   Plumbing the Soul
 
Makeup, hair, lipstick
cannot hide
a linebacker body
clear thinkers
understood

long ago
and cared not –  is this inversion necessary?

if-if
joined
by such
in a public toilet

as it is called
in civilized places.  weasel noted - "toilet" ambivalent between singular and plural
 
But let it be
a Men’s, Women’s,
Ladies, Gent’s,
Powder or
Rest Room
and
all changes.

 
The inescapable
shame
that keeps humans
from being
kings of all
is that they
and beasts both
produce waste.  actually, shame is peculiar to humans:  as Mark Twain noted, man is the only animal that blushes - or needs to.
 
That shame
unites
men and women
in public toilets,

where they are
close in kinship as
animals.
Higher,

though still animals.
 
 Cloistered apart
in Ladies, Gents,
Men’s, Women’s,
Powder,
Rest

Rooms
to commit their
humiliating deeds,
humanity’s
natural duets
are divided

into
We and

They.  Or, not simply but complexly, tries to accomodate a real difference.
 
But where are
remade folk,
not born

We or They  these two lines are a weasel - don't confuse choice with hermaphrodites
to go?

 
Easy for those
living among
clear thinkers:
public toilets
where each stall
conceals all.  this is the Target remedy - arrived at too late and under severe stress
 
No need to
create a
support community
because it takes only
one to poop,
shake or wipe
a pee
in privacy.
 
What matters is
soul,
not
personal plumbing’s

use or change
or whether it
and owner
agree
on who to be.
 
Once that’s
understood,

live your life,
let others
live theirs.  Including the part of their lives where they decide to reject you?
 

Ignoring other critical comments not because they lack quality, just trying to address the work head-on.

The logical problem here is that the Modified make themselves (in an about turn on Julius Caesar, who was every woman's husband and every man's wife) everyone's They.  It's a choice, and other people's choice to remain in their socially "constructed" We's Big Grin must be likewise respected.  A bit like public electric-car chargers:  no one's going to emplace them everywhere for a few thousand electrics that can use them.  "I want to be one of you!" can't take precedence over "As a result of your actions, you can't be."

As an argument for a particular way of thinking, this is well done (aside from a few archaisms and assertions contrary to fact - the Romans also segregated their baths by gender... though it's an intriguing question where Greek hetaeras went:  wherever trade took them, probably).   The main criticism (aside from that it *is* polemical, but that's a choice which should be respected) is that it's at least twice as long as necessary to make its point.  In a spirit of Miscellaneous, see how your argument can be strengthened by addressing expected objections and expressing your assertions in fewer but carefully chosen words.
feedback award Non-practicing atheist
Reply
#13
(10-06-2016, 11:06 PM)dukealien Wrote:  
(10-06-2016, 05:34 AM)zorcas Wrote:   Plumbing the Soul
 
Makeup, hair, lipstick
cannot hide
a linebacker body
clear thinkers
understood

long ago
and cared not –  is this inversion necessary?

if-if
joined
by such
in a public toilet

as it is called
in civilized places.  weasel noted - "toilet" ambivalent between singular and plural
 
But let it be
a Men’s, Women’s,
Ladies, Gent’s,
Powder or
Rest Room
and
all changes.

 
The inescapable
shame
that keeps humans
from being
kings of all
is that they
and beasts both
produce waste.  actually, shame is peculiar to humans:  as Mark Twain noted, man is the only animal that blushes - or needs to.
 
That shame
unites
men and women
in public toilets,

where they are
close in kinship as
animals.
Higher,

though still animals.
 
 Cloistered apart
in Ladies, Gents,
Men’s, Women’s,
Powder,
Rest

Rooms
to commit their
humiliating deeds,
humanity’s
natural duets
are divided

into
We and

They.  Or, not simply but complexly, tries to accomodate a real difference.
 
But where are
remade folk,
not born

We or They  these two lines are a weasel - don't confuse choice with hermaphrodites
to go?

 
Easy for those
living among
clear thinkers:
public toilets
where each stall
conceals all.  this is the Target remedy - arrived at too late and under severe stress
 
No need to
create a
support community
because it takes only
one to poop,
shake or wipe
a pee
in privacy.
 
What matters is
soul,
not
personal plumbing’s

use or change
or whether it
and owner
agree
on who to be.
 
Once that’s
understood,

live your life,
let others
live theirs.  Including the part of their lives where they decide to reject you?
 

Ignoring other critical comments not because they lack quality, just trying to address the work head-on.

The logical problem here is that the Modified make themselves (in an about turn on Julius Caesar, who was every woman's husband and every man's wife) everyone's They.  It's a choice, and other people's choice to remain in their socially "constructed" We's :D must be likewise respected.  A bit like public electric-car chargers:  no one's going to emplace them everywhere for a few thousand electrics that can use them.  "I want to be one of you!" can't take precedence over "As a result of your actions, you can't be."

As an argument for a particular way of thinking, this is well done (aside from a few archaisms and assertions contrary to fact - the Romans also segregated their baths by gender... though it's an intriguing question where Greek hetaeras went:  wherever trade took them, probably).   The main criticism (aside from that it *is* polemical, but that's a choice which should be respected) is that it's at least twice as long as necessary to make its point.  In a spirit of Miscellaneous, see how your argument can be strengthened by addressing expected objections and expressing your assertions in fewer but carefully chosen words.

Very good observations. Tried in this poem to sneak up on the problem, given that the uproar over sexual orientation and modification is driven by the irrational on all sides of the issue. Uni-sex public toilets have been around in Europe and other places for a long time with few problems resulting, but the troglodytes fight the idea and too many real or imagined sex-related victims over dramatize their situations. Further, as this poem and the comments it stirred up shows, poets are better off these days staying away from social comment and confining themselves to harmless and empty subjects.
Reply
#14


        Hemingway was quite manly a man;
        He did ev'rything that a man can.
        His prose, though quite Spartan,
        He couldn't take heart in,
        So ended it by his own hand.



        (And if you happen to be thinking that this is off-topic,
        you haven't read the exchanges above closely enough.)



(10-06-2016, 05:34 AM)zorcas Wrote:  And just what is that "them" referencing?

        Yeah, the third line used to be "books" instead of "prose" and that "them"
        ended up getting left down there all by its lonesome. I changed it.
        Thanks for catching that.

        P.S. Though, being such a manly man (and I suppose you'll want me to change
        "manly" to "man-ish" next), I guess he replaced, for a time, the Spartans as a
        popular metaphor for manliness -- to be eclipsed, fame being fleeting and all,
        by Arnold Schwarzenegger. Smile

                                                                                                                a brightly colored fungus that grows in bark inclusions
Reply
#15
(10-06-2016, 11:40 PM)zorcas Wrote:   poets are better off these days staying away from social comment and confining themselves to harmless and empty subjects.

no, what it means is, popularist [youtbe] social politics is a silly and empty subject, and that poets 'these days' should stay away from crap poetry about it. . . like they did in the old days.. . . and all other days.
Reply
#16
(10-07-2016, 09:55 AM)shemthepenman Wrote:  
(10-06-2016, 11:40 PM)zorcas Wrote:   poets are better off these days staying away from social comment and confining themselves to harmless and empty subjects.

no, what it means is, popularist [youtbe] social politics is a silly and empty subject, and that poets 'these days' should stay away from crap poetry about it. . . like they did in the old days.. . . and all other days.

Politics is not a game but a serious battlefield where competing sides fight for power. Sometimes that power is used wisely, other times used mainly for the benefit of those wielding it who usually want even more. They always say they're doing it for the good of the people. If poets can open some eyes to what's going on all will be better  for it. To say this is an empty subject will please those power mongers because they know you'll simply ignore their bad  behavior--so they can keep on doing it.

The only reason for poets to stay away from controversy is that it is far less likely than feel good writing to see the light of day.
Reply
#17
At some point, someone should mention Shelley's 

Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world

and the essay it concludes.

Politics is about the management of (societal) force and violence; war is a continuation of politics with an admixture of means (Clausewitz).  But the control mechanism of politics, even in a monarchy, is rhetoric... and since even the most peremptory order or irresistible sentiment must be conceived before expressed, like it or not (and they don't) all political power flows from the mouth of... poets (of which Mao was one).

But lest we forget, Shelley died because his boat didn't float.  Violence is only one small aspect of engineering. Tongue
feedback award Non-practicing atheist
Reply
#18
Just to weigh back in on the thoughts from the original post, rather than the execution of the poem itself which I find rather good for a style I don't especially seek out (the layout is a bit tumblr-ish for me, though the phrasing is accomplished and rather attractive) -- anyway. We have had unisex toilets here in public places for some time, particularly at the beach. They're basically just rows of individual cubicles. I don't recall any specific problems with them attracting terribly predatory men in dresses, or women in overalls. Rather to the contrary, people here don't seem to be thinking sexual thoughts while they're evacuating bladder or bowel -- maybe it's different in the USA. We'll pretty much believe anything of Americans these days...

In fact, pretty much the only thing that I wonder about this whole "debate" is why it's such a loud, highly visible issue and what is it a smokescreen for? I would worry less about sexual assault in a public toilet and more about the faceless men (and women, and trans/ gender fluid/ part donkey, whatever) who are very quietly screwing everyone.
It could be worse
Reply
#19
(10-07-2016, 12:06 PM)Leanne Wrote:  Just to weigh back in on the thoughts from the original post, rather than the execution of the poem itself which I find rather good for a style I don't especially seek out (the layout is a bit tumblr-ish for me, though the phrasing is accomplished and rather attractive) -- anyway.  We have had unisex toilets here in public places for some time, particularly at the beach.  They're basically just rows of individual cubicles.  I don't recall any specific problems with them attracting terribly predatory men in dresses, or women in overalls.  Rather to the contrary, people here don't seem to be thinking sexual thoughts while they're evacuating bladder or bowel -- maybe it's different in the USA.  We'll pretty much believe anything of Americans these days...

In fact, pretty much the only thing that I wonder about this whole "debate" is why it's such a loud, highly visible issue and what is it a smokescreen for?  I would worry less about sexual assault in a public toilet and more about the faceless men (and women, and trans/ gender fluid/ part donkey, whatever) who are very quietly screwing everyone.

Part of the problem is TV which needs to focus on drama and excitement to draw eyeballs to watch commercials. So a complaint at one toilet ends up looking like a national problem. Next we have the grievance industry always looking for another clutch of people venting, resenting or inventing agonizing tales about how they're being ignored--poor things. Right now, half of Florida may be flooded or wiped out with huge numbers who played the weather odds  finding they lost their bets and expect reasonable folk to pick up the tab for their bad judgments.

Many complain about "inequality" but are too dense to see that them what has gets. People with little houses will be taxed to subsidize those whose vacation homes on the beaches and islands are being demolished by Nature.
Reply
#20
TV and Facebook. Let us never underestimate the power of Suckerberg.
It could be worse
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!