07-04-2016, 08:23 PM
Rivernotch's intro to a critique:
ellajam wrote:
Quote:Trying out something different. Riverproof is me proofreading the work (to the best of my unprofessional, but professionally obsessive-compulsive, abilities), and as such is expected to be immediately addressed, in the poem if an unconscious decision, in a reply if conscious. All else, actual crit, which in this case, however long my last note is, is fairly short, I think -- I'm just feeling especially wordy today.
ellajam wrote:
Quote:??? Are you saying the OP must address your notes immediately? All the OP is required to do is consider comments, not take action.
(07-01-2016, 08:49 PM)lizziep Wrote: RiverNotch: I will look at your critiques. Thanks for spending time with the piece.
I am going to ask that you remember that this is my work and not yours -- demanding that I make certain changes or respond to you in a particular way is inappropriate and a boundary violation. Please refrain from doing this in the future.
Best,
lizziep
(07-04-2016, 04:31 PM)RiverNotch Wrote: Ah, sorry. I treat all crits, both given and received, as two parts strangely blended together: one part actual critiquing (so, talking about aesthetic choices, moral issues, spiritual feelings, etc.), the other part basic proofreading -- here, I tried to clarify the divide between the two, since I consider proofreading to be essentially universal, being based on more concrete rules. Thus the expectation that they be responded to immediately, as in they receive the greatest priority if the lines are not to be changed in sense or style, and not as in the temporal sense, since they are, again, based on more concrete rules, and are all focused on fairly superficial errors. I suppose my language was just a little too aggressive.
billy wrote:welcome to the site. make it your own, wear it like a well loved slipper and wear it out. ella pleads:please click forum titles for posting guidelines, important threads. New poet? Try Poetic DevicesandWard's Tips