somehow i don't see religion challenging the theory of evolution.
lines in art etc (poetry) are usually drawn in the readers eye and thoughts.
for me it looks and reads as prose poetry, which i see as a genre of poetry.
it has more than a couple of poetic devices in it's structure.
i should have said about religion; not challenging it in a way as to prove the Darwinian theory wrong.
as for rational. many erudite men have argued that the bible should be taken literally, specially the part about evolution and the beginnings of life on earth.
lines in art etc (poetry) are usually drawn in the readers eye and thoughts.
for me it looks and reads as prose poetry, which i see as a genre of poetry.
it has more than a couple of poetic devices in it's structure.
i should have said about religion; not challenging it in a way as to prove the Darwinian theory wrong.
as for rational. many erudite men have argued that the bible should be taken literally, specially the part about evolution and the beginnings of life on earth.