wikileaks

[billy]

is that what you deem?

i think the docs were stolen.

i think the rape is a legality which is being used immorally to make someone a name.
i'm sure he won't be charged with rape as such.

i really do think the docs were stolen, that said i think sometimes certain docs need to be stolen and shown to the public. these docs for me are not those. it's mainly small talk and has no real bearing on a bucket of crap. (although a few may be of concern)i am based i guess, because for some reason i can't stand assange. i belive some of the war leaks should have been shown.

i just struggle with the fact that julien for some reason puts himself up as the editor and founder of such. (or the media does and he doesn't deny the point)

i struggle that he wants openess yet i'll never get to see his and other correspondence pertaining to wikileaks. are they above what assange deems 'the truth" who guards the guards"?

i don't think assange would know the truth if it dribbled out of the end of a broken condom. he's an ego in need of praise and thats all he is. he's a dishonest as any liar, as any secret keeping gov or person.for me he has an agenda and that agenda is to propagate himself into fame. i find him to be the very anti thesis of wikileaks.