03-21-2014, 06:45 PM
(03-21-2014, 06:32 PM)tectak Wrote:(03-20-2014, 08:32 PM)ChristopherSea Wrote: It looks like you have plenty of feedback thus far. My overall critique concerns the evolution theme and repeats. I think I am not connecting to the references. I see biology, astronomy, theoretical physics and religious theory. Where is the natural selection and adaptive mutation that are key to evolutionary mechanism. Wolf-to-dog is relevant and a favorite line. I like the badges as well, but anthropomorphic is usually employed to ascribe human traits to nonhuman species. Perhaps you are speaking on the evolution of the human mind. I may be missing a lot, as I have not read all of the above discourse.Hi chris,
assuming you have read the c and c's can I hope that you see the train of thought?
Evolution of the eye
Evolution of hearing
Evoution of sense of smell
Then...complete collapse of the "natural" process as intellect and technological "progress" intervenes. I hope I am wrong but once we start buggering about with genes I think we are stuffed
I was concerned about the use of anthropomorphic but I am sticking to my guns. I constantly hear of genes being anthropomorphised...the selfish gene...we are our genes...the suicide gene...blame the genes etc.
Best,
tectak
Yes, I see your train of thought and play on this term. Thanks for taking the time to provide additional explanation.
My new watercolor: 'Nightmare After Christmas'/Chris


