09-30-2013, 03:51 AM
(09-30-2013, 03:29 AM)tigrflye Wrote: Milo,You make some interesting points and I would love to discuss them but not in a poem thread in the serious critique section. Let's just accept that this poem will need meter for now and we can work out the why's later.
Thank you for your reply. I am not "familiar" or overly comfortable with meter, although we have been introduced.
I was going for a loose rythm, rather than a strict meter..admittedly because it was easier considering the rhyme constriction.
Some great poets have made it work (rhyme without meter) .. Sylvia Plath's Daddy has a changing meter. Please don't think I would ever compare myself. I'm not. And if it doesn't work, well it doesn't work.
Would you suggest step-one in the clean up process be breaking the poem apart and adopting a meter?
So, pick a meter (I would suggest iambic tetrameter in this case as it will showcase the lightness of the verse without making it "flip" but the choice is yours. After that, I can diagram it for you, if you would like, or even pad to perfect meter for you allowing you to just sub out the padding for similar words.
(A note: changing meter is not the same as no meter, I have quite a few changing meter poems on this board myself)

