(04-30-2010, 08:57 AM)billy Wrote:  the william gheen tripe

the one thats says;
senator graham has backed away
the amnesty legislation 7 days after this speech was
delivered in his back yard.

it isn't mentioned once in the vid. why
because it's pure and utter tripe.
it's just been stuck to make people think thats what the vid is about.

on the stage they call it misdirection.
in this usage i call it utter tripe. it has no bearing whatsoever on this discussion. it has no source of proof. it's just a paste stuck to the window
of tripe.

so the guys gay...so fucking what. wheres the proof he was being blackmailed?

and please don't speculate because speculation isn't proof,

Ya what ever but I did not post it.

(04-30-2010, 08:59 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 08:57 AM)billy Wrote:  the william gheen tripe

the one thats says;
senator graham has backed away
the amnesty legislation 7 days after this speech was
delivered in his back yard.

it isn't mentioned once in the vid. why
because it's pure and utter tripe.
it's just been stuck to make people think thats what the vid is about.

on the stage they call it misdirection.
in this usage i call it utter tripe. it has no bearing whatsoever on this discussion. it has no source of proof. it's just a paste stuck to the window
of tripe.

so the guys gay...so fucking what. wheres the proof he was being blackmailed?

and please don't speculate because speculation isn't proof,

Ya what ever but I did not post it.

so nad posted it.
does it make it less tripey. nope
it's still tripe
ans still off topic

so did you find any proof that lindsey was being blackmailed yet?
any good source perhaps?

(04-30-2010, 09:12 AM)billy Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 08:59 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 08:57 AM)billy Wrote:  the william gheen tripe

the one thats says;
senator graham has backed away
the amnesty legislation 7 days after this speech was
delivered in his back yard.

it isn't mentioned once in the vid. why
because it's pure and utter tripe.
it's just been stuck to make people think thats what the vid is about.

on the stage they call it misdirection.
in this usage i call it utter tripe. it has no bearing whatsoever on this discussion. it has no source of proof. it's just a paste stuck to the window
of tripe.

so the guys gay...so fucking what. wheres the proof he was being blackmailed?

and please don't speculate because speculation isn't proof,

Ya what ever but I did not post it.

so nad posted it.
does it make it less tripey. nope
it's still tripe
ans still off topic

so did you find any proof that lindsey was being blackmailed yet?
any good source perhaps?

Have you found any proof that 99% of what I post is tripe yet?

(04-30-2010, 09:21 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 09:12 AM)billy Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 08:59 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 08:57 AM)billy Wrote:  the william gheen tripe

the one thats says;
senator graham has backed away
the amnesty legislation 7 days after this speech was
delivered in his back yard.

it isn't mentioned once in the vid. why
because it's pure and utter tripe.
it's just been stuck to make people think thats what the vid is about.

on the stage they call it misdirection.
in this usage i call it utter tripe. it has no bearing whatsoever on this discussion. it has no source of proof. it's just a paste stuck to the window
of tripe.

so the guys gay...so fucking what. wheres the proof he was being blackmailed?

and please don't speculate because speculation isn't proof,

Ya what ever but I did not post it.

so nad posted it.
does it make it less tripey. nope
it's still tripe
ans still off topic

so did you find any proof that lindsey was being blackmailed yet?
any good source perhaps?

Have you found any proof that 99% of what I post is tripe yet?

i don't need to i'm not the one making the claims, your sources are and you are substantiating them without what the majority of people would call a reliable source, i'm asking you to show a reliable source to prove it.

so untill you back up the claims you and the vids make i'll call it tripe.

i nearly always show what most deem to be reasonable source material as i did in the polar ice ice post.

(04-30-2010, 09:27 AM)billy Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 09:21 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 09:12 AM)billy Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 08:59 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  

(04-30-2010, 08:57 AM)billy Wrote:  the william gheen tripe

the one thats says;
senator graham has backed away
the amnesty legislation 7 days after this speech was
delivered in his back yard.

it isn't mentioned once in the vid. why
because it's pure and utter tripe.
it's just been stuck to make people think thats what the vid is about.

on the stage they call it misdirection.
in this usage i call it utter tripe. it has no bearing whatsoever on this discussion. it has no source of proof. it's just a paste stuck to the window
of tripe.

so the guys gay...so fucking what. wheres the proof he was being blackmailed?

and please don't speculate because speculation isn't proof,

Ya what ever but I did not post it.

so nad posted it.
does it make it less tripey. nope
it's still tripe
ans still off topic

so did you find any proof that lindsey was being blackmailed yet?
any good source perhaps?

Have you found any proof that 99% of what I post is tripe yet?

i don't need to i'm not the one making the claims, your sources are and you are substantiating them without what the majority of people would call a reliable source, i'm asking you to show a reliable source to prove it.

so untill you back up the claims you and the vids make i'll call it tripe.

i nearly always show what most deem to be reasonable source material as i did in the polar ice ice post.

Well Bill, most people I know accept the links provided by me here as credible, lol, it is at this place only you and maybe 1 or two others that don't. I have provided you with credible links, because you don't like it, I really can't help that man. Take it or leave it but yes you do have to prove that 99% of it is tripe.
When you do i'll discuss the matter further bud.

that's cool.
i'm sure others have some input to give.
do they think the source is credible or not?

like is say for it's just hooey and tripe. spat out by tripe hounds who want their ten minutes of right wing conspiracy theorists fame.

few take any notice. and that's a reliable source.
if they did it would be main stream and not a poky radio station.
that few have actually heard of or tune into.
most of the shit and tripe is spread by youtube which i also find to be hilarious. while main stream may use youtube it's not their main mode of getting that crunchingly truthful story to the public.

naw for me the whole infowars thing is nothing more than a farce.

an edit.

i see what you mean now

because some moron at infowars says it's so i must believe it because unless i can't prove them wrong it true.
i get it at last.

infowars gets it right and everyone else gets it wrong.
info wars doesn't have to prove what it says but everyone else does. nice premise but infowars makes statements it can't proove and has no reliable source for. i don't have to prove them wrong ben. they haven't said anything worthy of being the truth as far as i and the majority can see.
that a real good source right there when you think of it. it's a pox box operation followed by a few (percentage wise) people .

tripe as i say.