The well funded, well organized, global skeptic network laid bare /sarc
#1
Gosh, according to Leftfootforward, we skeptics are just a step away from global media domination. I suppose it didn’t occur to the people that researched this and drew up the network diagram that both sides are about equal in the “networking”. Yet only one side is “bad”.

Read the entire article
http://www.infowars.com/the-well-funded-...bare-sarc/
Reply
#2
(03-25-2010, 01:01 PM)Benny2guns Wrote:  Gosh, according to Leftfootforward, we skeptics are just a step away from global media domination. I suppose it didn’t occur to the people that researched this and drew up the network diagram that both sides are about equal in the “networking”. Yet only one side is “bad”.

Read the entire article
http://www.infowars.com/the-well-funded-...bare-sarc/
so does this mean i'm on the good side. Smile

i take this stuff with a pinch of salt. global media domination. i larfed.
the net supoports all kinds of people. it's big enough. i don't take sides i look and make my own mind up. in fact i enjoy some of the reading from these sites. even if i don't belive most of whats said it can make someone have a second look at a given situation.

so i'd say the same. we don't have bad and good, we just have people with differring opinions.
Reply
#3
Yeah, information on the web just falls into some sort of order like everything in the world does. Supposedly it's this parity in the internet that makes it exciting: memes and virals don't come from a major source that's pushing it, but rather has to disseminate organically.

I agree that it's good to see dissenting opinions, as it gives you perspective. Learned a good quote about that by Aristotle: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." Smile
PS. If you can, try your hand at giving some of the others a bit of feedback. If you already have, thanks, can you do some more?
Reply
#4
true.

it's a bit like accepting some music you don't like is still good or played well.

for me i love the fact joe blogs can put up some pice of crap and we can all have a look. what's reallu good is that sometimes the piece of crap turns out to be a gem
Reply
#5
(03-25-2010, 04:47 PM)billy Wrote:  
(03-25-2010, 01:01 PM)Benny2guns Wrote:  Gosh, according to Leftfootforward, we skeptics are just a step away from global media domination. I suppose it didn’t occur to the people that researched this and drew up the network diagram that both sides are about equal in the “networking”. Yet only one side is “bad”.

Read the entire article
http://www.infowars.com/the-well-funded-...bare-sarc/

so does this mean i'm on the good side. Smile

i take this stuff with a pinch of salt. global media domination. i larfed.
the net supoports all kinds of people. it's big enough. i don't take sides i look and make my own mind up. in fact i enjoy some of the reading from these sites. even if i don't belive most of whats said it can make someone have a second look at a given situation.

so i'd say the same. we don't have bad and good, we just have people with differring opinions.

What do you suppose ACTA is about bill? It's about controlling the internet man. And this is one reason why.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!