06-25-2013, 11:41 AM
I concur with Tom now that it should be flesch. He convinced me once more. ;-)
I even think that Flesch would be wrong.
I even think that Flesch would be wrong.
|
Play the violin again edit 2. leanne,serge.edit 1 milo,svan,rc,billy, serge et al
|
|
06-25-2013, 11:41 AM
I concur with Tom now that it should be flesch. He convinced me once more. ;-)
I even think that Flesch would be wrong.
06-29-2013, 06:57 PM
06-30-2013, 06:00 AM
(06-20-2013, 08:23 PM)tectak Wrote: I think your poem begins here:
06-30-2013, 07:01 AM
(06-30-2013, 06:41 AM)trueenigma Wrote:(06-20-2013, 08:23 PM)tectak Wrote: Play the violin again; (06-20-2013, 08:23 PM)tectak Wrote: Play the violin again;
It could be worse
06-30-2013, 07:42 AM
leanne wrote:
"Your tender notes will soothe the strings; -- with the t on the previous line, this is a touch too tinny -- if the previous t were replaced, the softer nd would predominate and slide into the sibilants more smoothly" but I have a different problem with that line my friend wrote here : I agree that the line is tinny because of what it means. Tom, it is not a good line (meaning-wise) You are a good poet but not here. You are not as shallow as this line. cheers serge (almost drunk)
06-30-2013, 07:48 AM
Now that I think about it, cutting that line entirely would do no damage to the poem and would enhance the sonics... provided the harsher palatal and dentals of the previous line are dealt with
It could be worse
06-30-2013, 05:02 PM
(06-30-2013, 07:22 AM)Leanne Wrote:Hi leanne, and sergei if he reads it.(06-20-2013, 08:23 PM)tectak Wrote: Play the violin again; You both make very sound suggestions...though the fulfillment is difficult. I will try. I have trouble with the X to Y to Z structure. Too many "to's". That is where I will start. Best, tectak
06-30-2013, 05:31 PM
(06-30-2013, 07:48 AM)Leanne Wrote: Now that I think about it, cutting that line entirely would do no damage to the poem and would enhance the sonics... provided the harsher palatal and dentals of the previous line are dealt with wow! God: i am gonna show this around to my dried out linguists. Thats so fucking brilliant a remark. yes! so cute. cheers!
06-30-2013, 06:32 PM
(06-30-2013, 05:31 PM)serge gurkski Wrote:Fuck the linguists ( Can you say that here?)...I'm gonna tell my dentist!(06-30-2013, 07:48 AM)Leanne Wrote: Now that I think about it, cutting that line entirely would do no damage to the poem and would enhance the sonics... provided the harsher palatal and dentals of the previous line are dealt with tectak
06-30-2013, 06:46 PM
(06-30-2013, 06:32 PM)tectak Wrote:(06-30-2013, 05:31 PM)serge gurkski Wrote:Fuck the linguists ( Can you say that here?)...I'm gonna tell my dentist!(06-30-2013, 07:48 AM)Leanne Wrote: Now that I think about it, cutting that line entirely would do no damage to the poem and would enhance the sonics... provided the harsher palatal and dentals of the previous line are dealt with Tom, I was flirting with Leanne. ;-) I could not resist.
06-30-2013, 07:10 PM
Serge, stop drinking now.
Tom, symphony is nice (especially as a proper noun)... it might be just me, but I think the rhythm is better as just "to Symphony's allure".
It could be worse
06-30-2013, 07:15 PM
06-30-2013, 07:18 PM
I'd probably leave it alone now if I were you
![]() It really is lovely.
It could be worse
06-30-2013, 07:48 PM
(06-30-2013, 07:15 PM)tectak Wrote:(06-30-2013, 07:10 PM)Leanne Wrote: Serge, stop drinking now. (haha to tom's reaction: yes that is beautiful: symphony's allure) Leanne it would make little sense I stopped driniking before I stumble into the next lonely woman. So:be patient and just grin when you read me. ) Back to the poem and this to the poet; Please leave the poem as is. You yourself gave me the same advice. (recall my rabbit poem?) Yes, of course you can better any poem. But Tom. qualified people like this your poem. so let just go. cheers my friend (06-30-2013, 07:18 PM)Leanne Wrote: I'd probably leave it alone now if I were you yes, exactly! My thoughts.
07-01-2013, 05:28 PM
(06-20-2013, 08:23 PM)tectak Wrote: Edit 2 I like the edits. Edit 2 is a keeper in my opinion.
07-01-2013, 09:46 PM
(07-01-2013, 05:28 PM)R.C. KITCHENS Wrote:(06-20-2013, 08:23 PM)tectak Wrote: Edit 2 OK. Thanks everyone. That's a wrap! Best, tectak (06-30-2013, 07:18 PM)Leanne Wrote: I'd probably leave it alone now if I were you Done. Thanks again. Best, tectak (06-24-2013, 05:03 AM)milo Wrote:(06-20-2013, 08:23 PM)tectak Wrote: Play the violin again; I didn't use the Urban Dictionary for "wafting"! Pearl Jam indeed. They're modernists! Best, tectak
07-01-2013, 10:51 PM
I understand it's a wrap, but I risk the wrath of ...I dunno. Just have to say this is a beautiful piece of writing, must commend you. It's lovely.
My best, Heart
07-02-2013, 12:18 AM
Hi Tom: have you considered reciting this poem?
In my opinion you should. serge (wait please. lest I forget not: cheers!)
07-02-2013, 12:32 AM
(07-01-2013, 10:51 PM)Heartafire Wrote: I understand it's a wrap, but I risk the wrath of ...I dunno. Just have to say this is a beautiful piece of writing, must commend you. It's lovely. Thanks heart, Missing you. Where have you been? I got a lot of input on this one...I should have waited for yours! Best, tectak (07-02-2013, 12:18 AM)serge gurkski Wrote: Hi Tom: have you considered reciting this poem? Hi serge, most of my keepable stuff gets recited sooner or later. We have some good poetry groups here, if sporadic in their meet-ups. That's how it should be....of course, it doesn't stop you reciting it...I assume you are a teutonic bass. . Nothing else would do.Best, tectak |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|