Should we have it?
if so, for what crimes?
Are you against it.
discuss anything to do with
or about the death penalty
but keep it sensible. the first
"i think aliens should be hung"
will result in sewer mockery for the
offending post. anyway just keep it on track.

I think Child murder and (though i'm not saying it's right)
child rape (kids under say 10 years old)

I've always said rapist should be wasted but
someone, many times, rape isn't as clear cut as it seems.

And repeat killers, rapists. I'd like someone to give me some reason to know one or two off the death sentance list but i'm not holding my breath.

I am firm in my stance that the Death Penalty should be in effect world wide. I am also firm in my stance that the penalty should not be human.
All child rapists and molesters....should be a mandatory death sentence without appeal, to be carried out within hrs of the sentence being handed out. These executions need also to be televised world wide. Sounds pretty sick and harsh, yes i know but personally i think it will work.
Murder....manditory as well and in the same fashion with the exception of temporary insanity by reason of killing a child rapist or molester who has committed his grisly crimes against one of the accused's children.

no,i don't agree with you guys,the dead penalty is totally unacceptable to me if it was only for reasons of mistakes being made.
lock them up forever i would say for the above mentioned crimes.

doesn't that blade have another edge.
what happens when they're released and kill or molest again.
it happens much more than a wrong death sentence.
isn't locking them up forever more cruel, though i guess like all experiences we adapt.
aren't we really just changing their lifestyle when we lock em up for ever?

i actually like the idea of televising it that benny suggested but for muder. i think murder a harder one to give the dp for. would it be the DP for 2nd degree as well as for 1st degree?

I was talking about 1st degree premeditated murder. That sort of person deserves to be executed.
I am by no means a cheap person....but i feel locking up these 2 types of offenders is a gross injustice to my wallet. Why in hell would i feed and cloth either one of them? I would not but the bleeding hearts of this world force me to. I say we start executing them with extreme malice and with global media coverage. Do that and watch the rates of these crimes fall.

maybe tickets could be sold to the public.
with profits going to fund the prison system.
not sure i agree but televised death penalties
would be a new idea. of course we have to watch out for
glory hounds who commit murder for fame.
we should kill those behind closed doors.

You sure your not a Yank?? Man some people will find an angle on anything. ROFLMAO.
Actually i am sure the advertising people will pay through the nose if ever the opportunity arose.
I don't believe in closed doors. If an individual were to commit one of those crimes for that reason alone their execution should be even more gruesome and the next of kin given the opportunity to select and carry out the form of execution.

next thing you're gonna suggest to slowly saw off their heads or something.an eye for an eye is not really a nice thing.
maybe we should let the victims or their family have a say in the matter after a reasonable time after the crime.

(12-24-2009, 09:59 PM)srijantje Wrote:  next thing you're gonna suggest to slowly saw off their heads or something.an eye for an eye is not really a nice thing.
maybe we should let the victims or their family have a say in the matter after a reasonable time after the crime.

Look at my last post ....i did say that the next of kin (meaning of the victim) should be given the opportunity to chose the type of death and the option to preform the execution themselves. I have not a shread....not a single bleeping shred of Mersey for a dirty piece of bleeping shit such as the people who commit these 2 crimes. Stop the bleeding hearts and save a child.
FXT/MOB

i think once you allow the victims families to
be involved you're moving away from law and order too much.
let them have their say by all means but let the law do the deed.
what happens if the victims family says, "let them go free" for
instance.

(12-26-2009, 11:26 AM)billy Wrote:  i think once you allow the victims families to
be involved you're moving away from law and order too much.
let them have their say by all means but let the law do the deed.
what happens if the victims family says, "let them go free" for
instance.

That can not happen, the sentance is manditory death, no exceptions accept that one i stated. Next of kin has the option to carry out the deed in any manner they choose. Great option if you ask me.
Hand me that dull ax please.

(12-26-2009, 11:33 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  

(12-26-2009, 11:26 AM)billy Wrote:  i think once you allow the victims families to
be involved you're moving away from law and order too much.
let them have their say by all means but let the law do the deed.
what happens if the victims family says, "let them go free" for
instance.

That can not happen, the sentance is manditory death, no exceptions accept that one i stated. Next of kin has the option to carry out the deed in any manner they choose. Great option if you ask me.
Hand me that dull ax please.

turn them upside down and push ball bearings up their arse,
sounds good but it would just take a bit more of our humanity away.
i think it should be a standard death.

take it easy you guys,it's not the sewer

Define a standard death please. Standard where? Seems the standards for death by execution are not set in stone. I guess a solution to setting standard death by execution means would be to include all forms of death by execution used world wide. I am more than fine with that solution.

(12-28-2009, 08:03 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  Define a standard death please. Standard where? Seems the standards for death by execution are not set in stone. I guess a solution to setting standard death by execution means would be to include all forms of death by execution used world wide. I am more than fine with that solution.

i see what you mean but for me, a standard death is one defined by the law of the land, state etc. lethal injection, hanging or electrocution. let the courts decide a way the death penalty is carried out and let all executions be done that way.

No I don't agree at all. Letting the court's decide is why we have people setting on death row for years and years at the peoples expense.
I say that the court's decide nothing really. They only sit as judges of a fair trial as that fair trial is defined by the people. The sentence...Death sentance and the way it can be carried out should reflect the way people from all parts of the world feel is a fitting style of execution. Thus everyone remains happy with a system that works. I can think of no better form of justice that will do justice for the victim and the survivors of these heinous crimes. I can also not think of any other more effective deterrent.

(12-28-2009, 01:26 PM)Benny2guns Wrote:  No I don't agree at all. Letting the court's decide is why we have people setting on death row for years and years at the peoples expense.
I say that the court's decide nothing really. They only sit as judges of a fair trial as that fair trial is defined by the people. The sentence...Death sentance and the way it can be carried out should reflect the way people from all parts of the world feel is a fitting style of execution. Thus everyone remains happy with a system that works. I can think of no better form of justice that will do justice for the victim and the survivors of these heinous crimes. I can also not think of any other more effective deterrent.

if we didn't have judges to give out the sentence we'd have a vigilante state.
once a person is found guilty their should be a short waiting period and then it should be carried out. if new proof isn't enough to release the convicted there and then it shouldn't count for a retrial. maybe allow two months for new evidence. that way the killer will have a time to fear whats coming.

the way it is now, lawyers manage to postpone indefinitely almost, the carrying out of the courts orders. i say stop that shit and do what the courts ordered.