07-12-2021, 01:55 AM
.
.
Hi Alex,
it's better, but not there yet, I think.
You're hanging on to 'petrichor' (and why wouldn't you, such a great word) but it's not adding anything to the poem, and your own phrases ('runoff murmurs absently', for instance) are overshadowed by it (which is a shame). Your piece is strong enough without it.
And what are the 'ghosts of gnats' in this?
I'm confused by 'today' - should verses one and two be in the past tense and verse three the present?
If so ...
Had we all left for boba tea as the adults
sung 'With or Without You' on the karaoke
we could have heard their echoes surrender
to a choir of frogs while runoff murmured
absently beneath the streets about a past
life that kept us waiting indoors.
And we would have been carried by our laughter,
through the interruptions of streetlit ghosts,
to a plaza of convenience stores, Filipino market
and boba cafe that yielded fluorescence
to our reflections passing in softly rippling puddles.
those stores are brimming with silences today
that slowly streaming into our estrangement;
but, that moment, crystallized by rain
in that familiar darkness between two worlds,
remains -- where there is always space for us.
'sing 'With or ...' is there anything better than 'sing'? Karaoke tells us that's what they're doing, but not how. In the UK, assuming the performance was of a poor quality we might say 'as the adults / murdered 'With or Without You' on the karaoke (as a for instance)
'dancing' rather weakens 'streetlit ghosts' (for me).
given all the 'mercantile' references in s2, is 'yield' right? (Likewise 'streaming'?)
if 'rippling' how 'reflections'?
you've laughter twice (s2, s3), maybe just cut it from s3? (And take another look at 'crystallized by', are you sure it works?)
There's still the problem of the conditional If that starts the piece, (verse three doesn't feel like it's a consequence of whether 'we all left' or not.
Best, Knot
.



