Hey thanks guys. Thanks for the feedback. I will attempt to provide more clarity for you guys and I'll add punctuation.
(08-12-2014, 03:22 AM)SomeRandom Wrote: This really needs punctuation. Not every line has to start with an uppercase letter. It was a little difficult to read at first.
Regarding the content of the poem, although I understood the gist of it I'm afraid I didn't understand what you were really trying to say. Perhaps you are being too vague, or perhaps I'm simply a little slow this morning.
Quote:The world awaits a war on wars Yes, I love peace, big fan!
A black flag as a declaration Why a black flag? White is a symbol for peace, but what does black stand for here?
To burn all flags and declarations Now I'm pretty sure you're talking about anarchy here, but now the black flag of L2 seems redundant. How does the first flag carry the message to burn all flags and declarations?
A friendship
Defending itself This seems vague. I think you're talking about the common interest each man has in being allies with each other.
A language before words This felt like it was a continuation of the last line and I don't know why it's in a new stanza. Furthermore, what is meant by "a language before words"? Words are pretty old, what came before them that constitutes a language? I'm not sure we can even separate language from words.
That can find unarmored hearts you can replace "that can" with "to". I'm not making the connection between peace, love, anarchy and "unarmored hearts" tbh.
In which to thrive and topple pillars
Of oppression and enslavement
And fear "and" is not necessary. Toppling pillars of oppression is cliche. I do like the message though. I certainly dislike enslavement, oppression and fear. I would enjoy seeing it annihilated in a more creative way; it has been toppled so many times before.
The world awaits a love armed
To create a state of sovereignty Okay... love will lead to sovereignty, what comes in between?
A weapon of mass liberation Waiting...
A bomb that bursts into
Flourishing moments Still waiting.....
You never tell us what happens! The ending leaves too many unanswered questions for me
. I want to know what this weapon of liberation is or at least in what capacity it will function to liberate humanity.
I appreciate your taking the time to respond to this as fully as you did. Let me just go through each comment and respond:
I thought it would be obvious why I chose black flag due to its anarchist associations. I would never say "I'm an anarchist" but I do enjoy philosophy related to what is called "anarchism," although I don't like the term. This is meant to be more spiritual than anything.
1)"How does the first flag carry the message to burn all flags and declarations..."
I'm not sure what you mean. The part you reference means fighting under the banner of a black flag (anarchy can be deduced from this, hint hint) to oppose all flags, even the black one. It's basically Jesus' lessons of love. Not the infatuation kind, but the deep respect for all life which can also be a secular feeling. A leaning toward cooperation rather than competition. (To be honest, I feel deconstructing it like this kills the poem. But that's why I'm here, I guess.)
Well, for it being vague, you sure hit the nail on the head! You say it clear as day. I'm glad you said it so perfectly: "the common interest each man has in being allies with each other." Spot on.
2)"This felt like it was a continuation of the last line and I don't know why it's in a new stanza. Furthermore, what is meant by "a language before words"? Words are pretty old, what came before them that constitutes a language? I'm not sure we can even separate language from words..."
A language before words is supposed to describe something we hold deeper than words. It is in the figurative sense. Like describing a hunter's feel for her surroundings as a "language." The way she scans the woods for signs of activity. It truly is an art form. Or, to be literal, before we
developed spoken language, and still lived together with unspoken trust
To be honest, I think that "That can" and "to" would fit just as well, but if it truly is that bad, I can change it as I would'nt be opposed to either. "peace, love, and anarchy" are all different words that mean the same thing, at least to me. And "unarmored hearts" simply means being open to one's self and to others - one of the most challenging things to overcome as a person.
Although it may sound cliche, and I may agree with you, is it really that bad if the point comes across in a concise way? I don't tend to change my writing without a little more feedback, not that I don't value what you have to say about this. I can appreciate that in itself. I may wait for further input, not that I'm owed it.
I've read plenty of great poems that are a lot more generous with their "and"s. But I did add punctuation. I hope that helps. And I don't mean to topple the pillars myself, nor do want this to have a "message." This is more of an expression than a message.
3)"Okay... love will lead to sovereignty, what comes in between?"
Whatever you imagine to come in between is what comes in between. And I don't know what shape the WML (I feel a little deflated that you didn't think this was clever. It's like weapon of mass destruction but opposite. Also, this poem looks like a bomb.) will take. If you're asking me how to liberate humanity, you're in for a shock. We've been trying for several thousand years. Again, I'm not trying to say what to do, only to express my thoughts about it.
My utmost thanks for your words and suggestions.