10-07-2013, 11:43 PM
Dear, LOVE your new sig, but don't tell Milo. *runs off with all her versions since it's a free-for-all*
|
Once were
|
|
10-07-2013, 11:43 PM
Dear, LOVE your new sig, but don't tell Milo. *runs off with all her versions since it's a free-for-all*
10-08-2013, 04:47 AM
I edited it yesterday, Chris. Actually, I had no thoughts of sex while writing this -- perhaps that's so unusual that people are going to assume it's there anyway
It could be worse
10-08-2013, 03:30 PM
it's quite a large edit so i'm not sure where to start
![]() (06-10-2013, 04:48 AM)Leanne Wrote: Edit 6/10/2013
10-18-2013, 04:42 AM
Hi Leanne,
Given the considerable response to this poem and the length of time since your revision, I was a bit reluctant to add my two cents, but my remarks I think are related to an important question for enough poets (e.g. some posts below) that I thought I'd throw them out here for consideration and then give your poem a critique. A poet friend of mine recently read a draft of a poem I've been laboring over and hit me with this: "For me it is like being dropped mid ocean without any sense of East or west or where the nearest shore may be--and the only thing that makes sense is to keep swimming onward and hope for the best." His remark, of course, is directed at the issue of accessibility. The same issue was addressed by a couple of poets at a reading I recently attended. So the question is how much do we wish, as communicators, to communicate as entirely as possible, at every level we can, with our art? When I was much younger, I was content to do a lot of suggesting and leave a reader with a mood and hopefully the motivation to work hard enough to fill in some blanks for themselves--I had trouble finding repeat readers, though that could have been for other reasons. : ) Having confronted my mortality though, I've decided I have very specific things to say that I really want understood and read or listened to with the most intense focus I can stimulate and that I can convey a mood or moods and still be understood, sometimes with helpful prodding from others and if I work hard at it given my lack of facility. So I'm very grateful to my friend, who was absolutely right, for pointing out that what I thought was clear was insufficiently developed and hopefully is no longer. All of that said, I'll share this quote I came across that is attributed to Emily Dickenson (I believe incorrectly): "To be a poet is all. To be known as a poet is nothing." Whoever wrote it, I think it's worth keeping in mind for various reasons. Now to your poem: (06-10-2013, 04:48 AM)Leanne Wrote: Edit 6/10/2013
10-19-2013, 04:43 PM
JunKai, thank you for your critique.
This poem has taught me two things: One, that there are rare situations in which, once the moment has passed, I have no real desire to alter a poem to fit anyone else's idea of what that moment should have been, and two, that presumably women can have no concerns about success other than that which is measured against sex and vulnerability to men's whims. I may edit it at some point in the future, but for now I think I will relegate it to evil memory.
It could be worse
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|