soulstice edit 1 billy, erthona

[tectak]

Exactly how do long dead observers...observe?
----------------------------------------------------------------
[undefined=undefined]......and go check out
Underground temperatures as indicators of surface temperatures – part 1 Posted by Ari Jokimäki on February 28, 2010[/undefined]

I did, that article is about climate change! (roll eyes)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you go and check out: Thermal Inertia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_ine...al_inertia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I almost died once from an allergic reaction to penicillin. Closed up my throat....couldn't talk, nearly killed me :p


Pest,

Dale

---

[quote='Erthona' pid='98691' dateline='1341487622']
Exactly how do long dead observers...observe?
----------------------------------------------------------------
[undefined=undefined]......and go check out
Underground temperatures as indicators of surface temperatures – part 1 Posted by Ari Jokimäki on February 28, 2010[/undefined]

I did, that article is about climate change! (roll eyes)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you go and check out: Thermal Inertia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_ine...al_inertia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I almost died once from an allergic reaction to penicillin. Closed up my throat....couldn't talk, nearly killed me :p


Pest,

Dale

Dead observers observe for EXACTLY 42years, 42mins, 42 seconds....I thought everyone knew that!
Regarding the superflous polemics of sub-soil temperatures, I go back to my old Nelkon and Nelkon days.
( 1) Q=Ka(t1 -t2)/x where K is the coefficient of thermal conductivity of the material under consideration, a is the area of applied heat, t1 is applied temperature at source and t2 is the temperature at sink, x is the thickness of the material under consideration.
From (1)
t1-t2=Qx/Ka
t2=t1-(Qx/Ka)
or, in layman's terms, t2 will always be affected by t1 regardles of x or K provided we don't exceed quantum limits!!!

...or not.

Good here innit. Sorry billy. End of discourse. Got a bit carried away.
Test,
tectak