02-21-2010, 09:10 PM
(02-21-2010, 08:40 AM)billy Wrote:I guess it's just different view points. Peter Sunde believes that you can't really thank the creator or help him in any way.Not just getting a song. Just like donating.. So he's suggesting a way. I hope it works anyway(02-21-2010, 08:22 AM)SidewaysDan Wrote:and which artists are these? and remember i did also say when you can download for free btw you can get one here for 2 dollars(02-21-2010, 07:59 AM)billy Wrote:I don't think so. Because for $2 you can't get a CD. But you could get an unlimited amount of things. And your fraction of the $2 goes straight to the artist. Not lost in some record company who'll spend it on lawyers to sue you later on...(02-21-2010, 01:21 AM)Katkwaraye Wrote: I'm not sure if I'm willing to compromise. But this is probably the best deal you can get, if it works.you can get a similar deal from many places on the net. opt ins for 2 dollars a month or more etc. the thing is they'll only be able to host the music of people who sign up.
those lesser named bands etc whose no ones heard of will pretty much remain unheard of. i can't see the music companies allowing their artist to sign up. so you'll be left with indies and the like. you may get some good stuff but in the main it'll be shit.
my question is this. why pay 2 or 10 dollars a month when you can download for free and buy a cd if you like it? or not depending on wealth and tightfistedness. all it is, is a cheaper version of itunes. (if it works)
and we presume it goes straight to the artist. people thought that of itunes at first. somehow i can't see all or even many of the top artist signing up for it. they simply won't be allowed to. come on people. you think if the recoding companies would agree to that. surely if they thought it was a worth while venture they'd do the same thing themselves?
no, the record labels don't care about the artist as long as they can make off them. letting them do the two dollar download as much as you can shit is just a big fat no no.

