03-15-2012, 05:19 PM
Form/style and linguistics/grammar would be the other two, although I have never heard anyone talk about the various components of poetry in such a mundane or idiosyncratic way before, especially as poetry had assumed, at least until recently that the author could write in grammatically correct prose.
I ignore facts that are not relevant and brought up as a smoke screen, not ones that are germane to the discussion.
Re: SA So you are saying you post "hoax poetry". I always suspected as much, as it is always easier, and safer to sit and take pot shots and never put your neck on the line.
"I'm a Mr. Alan (Guth?) physicist-ist" Thus the need for epicycles?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is my poetic dissertation on all things Modern Post Modern: I post it just for you Ray
http://pigpenpoetry.com/showthread.php?tid=5495
Dale
I ignore facts that are not relevant and brought up as a smoke screen, not ones that are germane to the discussion.
Re: SA So you are saying you post "hoax poetry". I always suspected as much, as it is always easier, and safer to sit and take pot shots and never put your neck on the line.
"I'm a Mr. Alan (Guth?) physicist-ist" Thus the need for epicycles?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is my poetic dissertation on all things Modern Post Modern: I post it just for you Ray
http://pigpenpoetry.com/showthread.php?tid=5495
Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.