I'm not really up on all that American do-it-our-way-or-else legislation, so I'm sorry if this has already been raised a zillion times before -- anyway, wouldn't it make sense for all those companies affected by the .com/.org/.net domain name blanket to just set up shop somewhere else? I know it's not feasible for tiny little sites, unfortunately. And my googling can continue fairly well uncensored because google.com.au will not be affected, nor any other .com.au, .co.uk etc.
Frankly, "artists" who insist on protecting their "intellectual property" should roll over and thank youtube for the free publicity. I know that I've often found something on youtube and gone out to buy the album/ see the concert/ get the dvd etc.
My further 2012 prediction: at least 98% of predictions made by internet psychics this year will fail to come true.
Frankly, "artists" who insist on protecting their "intellectual property" should roll over and thank youtube for the free publicity. I know that I've often found something on youtube and gone out to buy the album/ see the concert/ get the dvd etc.
My further 2012 prediction: at least 98% of predictions made by internet psychics this year will fail to come true.
It could be worse