01-07-2012, 05:46 AM
(01-03-2012, 07:39 PM)rayheinrich Wrote: [font=Courier New][size=1]I think you're intrinsically evil just for mentioning "Twilight" :p
If I were intrinsically evil, I'd change the snake metaphors to bat
and throw in some "Twilight" references...
(01-03-2012, 07:39 PM)rayheinrich Wrote: Since I like to read it as an internal discussion, I think a bit ofIt wasn't originally intended as an internal discussion, but there's no reason it can't be seen as such. In fact, most "poets" (bloody hell I hate that term these days, given the kinds of people who apply it to themselves) seem to have difficulty (at least initially) reconciling their writing with their everyday lives.
ambiguity as to 'person' is called for.
(01-03-2012, 07:39 PM)rayheinrich Wrote: Not many quibbles:I wouldn't mind getting rid of "close woven" entirely, but the idea itself is important (to me) -- it may be one of those babies that needs killing though. I originally intended "tightknit", as these types tend to move in single-brain-cell thought impulse mobs.
While it should really be "close-woven", I can just see
having "cross-eyed", "close-woven", and "gray-shadowed"
one after the other, so I understand.
(01-03-2012, 07:39 PM)rayheinrich Wrote: I would prefer a bit more anatomical accuracy, but, this beingI could try "2mm left of L2" if you like
poetry and all...

(01-03-2012, 07:39 PM)rayheinrich Wrote: "Lethe": well, don't get me started. While I personally dislikeAnything for you. Actually, I use Greek allusions all the time and am unapologetic about it -- they say exactly what I want to say without me having to think of anything original for myself...
anyone younger than 120 resorting to Greek allusionism, I am
willing to put up with it as long as they forgive my unremitting
drug metaphorizationizing.
It could be worse
