07-07-2011, 08:06 AM
the main reason for not guilty charges is reasonable doubt.
in this case i think the jury used the premise of "any" doubt, which isn't what the law says.
a person can be found guilty on circumstantial evidence, which is what it would have been for the actual killing.
for me, it was the way she acted, the things she said, the fact they refused to put her on the stand. that she had a dream team.
i just think there's something wrong with the outcome.
in this case i think the jury used the premise of "any" doubt, which isn't what the law says.
a person can be found guilty on circumstantial evidence, which is what it would have been for the actual killing.
for me, it was the way she acted, the things she said, the fact they refused to put her on the stand. that she had a dream team.
i just think there's something wrong with the outcome.