04-12-2011, 12:13 PM
the icelandic gov held the referendum knowing what the outcome would obviously be in order to say;
it was the will of the people. think is they still have banks in iceland and they could have been made to take over the debt. there was a 20 year allowence and as such the icelandic banks could have paid back the cash without hitting the population for any of it. another thing they could have done was nationalise the banks if they refused to co operate. though it only has a small population it was obviously able to rip off 5 bil from investors from other countries. most if not all international banks have a broad based incomes outside their own countries. instead what the gov did was say
we have to make you the population pay the debt back what do you think about that. very clever piece of smoke and mirrors but a fraud non the less
it was the will of the people. think is they still have banks in iceland and they could have been made to take over the debt. there was a 20 year allowence and as such the icelandic banks could have paid back the cash without hitting the population for any of it. another thing they could have done was nationalise the banks if they refused to co operate. though it only has a small population it was obviously able to rip off 5 bil from investors from other countries. most if not all international banks have a broad based incomes outside their own countries. instead what the gov did was say
we have to make you the population pay the debt back what do you think about that. very clever piece of smoke and mirrors but a fraud non the less