04-08-2011, 05:03 PM
lets say that the bad stuff that's done simply to deface property isn't art and talk about the good stuff.
can it be classed as art, true art or simply an adornment. early on in graffiti people used it to make statements.
for me that was art. now everyone and his mum is at it but it isn't the same thing, not for me anyway.
as for the first line, i think i dropped an egg because some of the new york subway trains which were defaced were for me, real works of art. as were some other defaced property. i'm still not sure either if the same thing painted on more than one spot is art of reproduction?
can it be classed as art, true art or simply an adornment. early on in graffiti people used it to make statements.
for me that was art. now everyone and his mum is at it but it isn't the same thing, not for me anyway.
as for the first line, i think i dropped an egg because some of the new york subway trains which were defaced were for me, real works of art. as were some other defaced property. i'm still not sure either if the same thing painted on more than one spot is art of reproduction?