wikileaks

[thethingy]

is that what you deem?

i think the docs were stolen.

i think the rape is a legality which is being used immorally to make someone a name.
i'm sure he won't be charged with rape as such.

i really do think the docs were stolen, that said i think sometimes certain docs need to be stolen and shown to the public. these docs for me are not those. it's mainly small talk and has no real bearing on a bucket of crap. (although a few may be of concern)i am based i guess, because for some reason i can't stand assange. i belive some of the war leaks should have been shown.

i just struggle with the fact that julien for some reason puts himself up as the editor and founder of such. (or the media does and he doesn't deny the point)

i struggle that he wants openess yet i'll never get to see his and other correspondence pertaining to wikileaks. are they above what assange deems 'the truth" who guards the guards"?

i don't think assange would know the truth if it dribbled out of the end of a broken condom. he's an ego in need of praise and thats all he is. he's a dishonest as any liar, as any secret keeping gov or person.for me he has an agenda and that agenda is to propagate himself into fame. i find him to be the very anti thesis of wikileaks.

I dislike him, the wikilekrs are just a business, its donation for this and donations for that and "here help me out give me cash for my defence" even though I'm in Europe and I get my defence for free, the stuffs just nonsense so far that to be fair you could off got on a FOI request or disclosed at the time limit with the names redacted, he is a cocky cunt, he went in front of a magistrate and mocked the court by giving a po box address then an alternative address in Australia, it's no surprise he's remanded but I'd rather take my chances on the streets than be in the nick on a sex charge.