wikileaks

[billy]

And that is called "deliberate molestation"? Sure, it's a bad example but it's something that should not be taken to court. I mean, the courts in Sweden have better things to do than this.

yes, it borders on this side of rape.

I'm sorry, I agree with most of what you said but not with this. Sure it's not morally right, probably not legally right either (we don't know the intricacies of Swedish law) but you it is not anywhere near rape.

From what I read he did want to have intercourse without a condom and even though they wanted to use a condom they did not refuse to provide him a service. They willingly were paid for sex - that's not rape. He did not force them, from what I deduce.

And I maintain that this case need not be in court.

legally, if you are asked to wear a condom and you say or pretend you are when you're not, it verges on rape. you're having unprotected sex without consent. you don't have to force someone to have sex for it to be rape.

it's all about permissions with exception. i do agree it's a crock of shit but legally they have him by the unprotected scrotum. the other thing is; we're jumping on the julian is innocent bandwagon with out really know the details. we all assume the swedish courts are populated by morons who want some recognition. we can assume his innocence which i do but we can't be certain.