10-01-2010, 11:51 AM
(10-01-2010, 11:08 AM)billy Wrote: it does appear that his boss thinks the guy is good at his job.The guy's boss knows more about him than you or I but if we simply assume that his judgement is sound then what is the point of discussing the matter?
(10-01-2010, 11:08 AM)billy Wrote: well i can't argue with the logic. but if he has rights he has rights. again while his boss thinks him a bully he also thinks him capable of doing the job. the thing is a pedo has committed some crime...My argument doesn't assume anyone has committed a crime, merely to want to. And it doesn't require a pedo: you wouldn't employ someone who hates cats to work in an animal shelter; you wouldn't employ someone illiterate to work in a library; you wouldn't employ someone afraid of the water to work as a lifeguard;...
(10-01-2010, 11:08 AM)billy Wrote: wouldn't sacking him when no charges have been laid be unfair.?If he's not up to the job he's not up to the job. It was unfair (to the candidate for the position he was chosen ahead of, and to the public whose taxpayer dollars are being used to pay him for doing a job he cannot do responsibly) to have given him the job in the first place and it would be unfair to allow him to keep it.
(10-01-2010, 11:08 AM)billy Wrote: people have been sacked for similar behaviour and failed in the fighting of said sackings. as his boss he has the right to sack the guy. from other supreme court cases the odds are that any litigation by the alleged stalker over his dismissal would fail. what i'm asking is that if that's the case why not just sack him ?That's a question only his boss can answer.
"The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool."