01-23-2010, 08:10 AM
(01-22-2010, 07:12 PM)Benny2guns Wrote:sorry benny but it doesn't really. a man can be married to one woman and live with another. he can claim for the woman he lives with but can't marry her.(01-22-2010, 07:09 PM)billy Wrote:That only holds if you are allowed to get married. This is the main reason for the rights not being allowed so far.(01-22-2010, 02:15 AM)SidewaysDan Wrote:i think it will eventually.(01-21-2010, 11:01 AM)Benny2guns Wrote: I honestly don't think so. The states won't allow it. Just my opinion but they won't pay a shed of extra tax if they don't have to. If that case is won it will open the door for tax payers to cover them under the social net also. I can't see it happening but who knows.You're right. Then every punter in the FBI with a girlfriend would claim benefits
It would be nice for it to happen but it just will not happen
all they have to do is say prove you've been partners for more than two years or so. and bob's your uncle.
in the uk we call them common law mariages,...if they look like a marriage, and smell like a marriage thats how the unmarried partner gets treated. they claim social security for their whole family regardless of if their married or not. they have title to the dead persons propert and belongings even though they're not married.


