Global Warming

[billy]

Which conspiracy theory are you refering to bill? Please elaborate on that one as I am not sure I am familiar with it. I am not saying that none of what we do has zero effect as that would be a crazy statement to make, deer shit has an effect so what. It will not bring about the end of the friggin world. I suppose if every human lined up and pointed their ass in the same direction then farted it may effect something adversly, i don't know but so what. Plastic, now thats something solid that I can lay my hands on and see the effect it may cause, it's patrolium based and full of chemicals so I say lets get ridd of it, outlaw it from being made, we can do it cause there are more of us than them but, oh ya, the guys at the top own those outfits and rule the world and could care less that you fart north or south as long as we don't all fart at the same time in their direction,the collective stench may be enough to shock us into a reality they have worked so long and hard to hide. JMO

it was a hoax that tried to prove all the scientist in the world who said we affect climate change on a large scale were lying. i'll get the source later. it came out in sync with the climate meetings in order to discredit them

Oh, ok i must have missed it so far but there is real proof that it has been missrepresented in order to cause undue panic and reap crazy proffits from the hystaria.
I am not useing spell check much but I am pretty sure you get me.

source?

heres mine; source:

exerpt;
I cannot condone some things that colleagues of mine wrote or requested in the e-mails recently stolen from a climate research unit at a British university. But the messages do not undermine the scientific case that human-caused climate change is real.

The hacked e-mails have been mined for words and phrases that can be distorted to misrepresent what the scientists were discussing. In a Dec. 9 op-ed, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin argued that "The e-mails reveal that leading climate 'experts' ... manipulated data to 'hide the decline' in global temperatures." Yet the e-mail she cites was written in 1999, just after the warmest year ever recorded (1998) to that date. It could not possibly have referred to the claim that global temperatures have declined over this decade -- a claim that is false (the current decade, as has been recently reported, will go down as the warmest on record).

In one case, professor Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia refers to a "trick" regarding temperature data that he attributes to an article that co-authors and I published in the journal Nature in 1998. We showed one up-to-date temperature data set from thermometer measurements along with a longer data set, based on calculations from natural "proxy" records such as ice cores, corals and tree rings, that ended in 1980. The "trick" (by which scientists generally mean a clever solution, i.e., a "trick of the trade") was that the longer-term record could be viewed.

another source;

another source;

excerpt;

The climate conspiracy theory falls apart when you consider the effort that would be required to sustain such a scam (recruiting thousands of scientists, falsifying mountains of data) and then ask what plausible motivation there could be to continue such a vast conspiratorial effort? None, is the simple answer.