09-07-2026, 10:26 AM
(09-07-2026, 01:05 AM)wasellajam Wrote:I did experience some gender confusion throughout - I would be pressed to determine which qualities the N was assigning to which gender if I was quizzed on it as well - which gender the N their selves was. That being said I don't think that was important - rather maybe that was to be the point - perhaps the whole is some metaphor about gender confusion? Mcuh of it seems to point that way if you are looking. The "We" if anything was the pronoun most bothersome(09-06-2026, 03:37 AM)matsunosuperfan Wrote:I did not get gender confusion at all. The N seems to feel they have it pretty much sorted, reinforced for me by the thought of switching in another life, experiencing something different. I can't find any changes in this poem that would help aim it where you want it to go but if you can tweak it to there I'd love to see how.(09-05-2026, 10:13 PM)RiverNotch Wrote:Thanks so much for taking the time <3 these are fair crits! Other than the accusation that the first line is redundant; it's just repetition for emphasis. Not saying that was a good or productive decision, but redundant it ain'tor at worst, purposely redundant.
I did mean to be a little bit of a Clever Boi with the "who gets which verbs" ambiguity. But I think it's mostly empty cleverness. "Empty calories" is a good charge to level against this poem in present form. The muddiness you refer to is meant to read as gender confusion/anxiety, but I agree that right now it mostly just comes across as vague gesturing from a pulpit that it's not clear the speaker deserves.


or at worst, purposely redundant.