Bodies at Daybreak

[Stan]

In intensive critique, I'll treat this as a descriptive, contemplative piece without a particular message or project.

On the whole, this is challenging and contains a wealth of original descriptive phrases.  And they all relate to sights one might see watching the moon set as the Sun rises, with bodies (heavenly, toad's, narrator's own) a second organizing system.

Frankly, though, it seems a little thrown-at-the-wall beyond that.  There's almost too much invention, some of it a bit obscure (those dye-ing feathers and the plumed chest).  I liked the parallel image structure of the first two stanzas, though it didn't carry through the remainder as strongly.

This could reasonably present the streamed thoughts of an imaginative viewer but, though it's not particularly short, there seems to be just a little too much squeezed into it; any of the stanzas contains enough material for two or three haiku (g).

So it's grand, and the interlinear above contains few recommendations for edits.  I'd suggest, with your gift for originality, that you *do* try a few haiku, for practice and to tame the  talent just a bit with form.   Along the same lines, practice simple declarative sentences which still contain your excellent descriptions.

Thank you very much for your thorough comments.
In the last two stanzas I was leaning towards a cat killing the toad. The last stanza could be the cat wondering why the walker has ignored its offerings. It could equally be, as you say, a female relative behind the glass combing her hair in sorrow. I suppose the insides and outsides of things are confused across the verses.  
A ‘cuticle’ is a little skin, and a ‘ventricle’ a little stomach, which carry across to the toad, and I wondered if his coin-shaped body could likewise be a votive coin.
But this is probably all too hidden, and I agree the whole thing is overly cryptic and descriptive.
I also agree it’s pretty inexcusable to drop the respiratory stuff by the end.
I might try to more explicitly introduce the cat earlier on—or significantly rework the end to extend the respiratory images.
I’ll try to pare back some of the description as well, or at least make it a bit more intelligible.

---

I think that this poem could benefit from some strategic periods. If you would like to accept this, I'd suggest organizing specifically the bottom few lines differently. You certainly have a talent for descriptive imagery but by adding too many words into the picture it makes it harder to follow and instead of the poem sounding mysterious its more so confusing. In all though, this is a lovely poem and I really enjoyed reading it.

Hi, thanks for your comments and encouragement. I agree it's a bit dense. I wasn't sure about the punctuation-- I wondered if the ambiguity was doing something. 'In the wind,' could have referred to the rock dove's breast or the cuticle of sleet, or both, for example. But the lack of clarity may just be a weakness.