04-08-2026, 04:52 AM
So I stumbled on this thread:
Interpretation…is it valid critique?
I got a refreshed view of what makes a useful critique and I think the first two pages would make interesting reading for members starting to critique. You can stop there unless you enjoy, as I do, arguments discussions on "subjective", "art", "cliche" and where twerk fits into language.
If you want to steal some poet jokes they're on page three.
I also enjoyed admin's mild and fruitless efforts to steer the thread back on track.
But I was glad to make it to the end for this snippet from Leanne (the post she's responding to is on the bottom of page seven)
Oh, and rowens, I really enjoyed
“like kidney stone skipping generations,”
Interpretation…is it valid critique?
I got a refreshed view of what makes a useful critique and I think the first two pages would make interesting reading for members starting to critique. You can stop there unless you enjoy, as I do, arguments discussions on "subjective", "art", "cliche" and where twerk fits into language.
If you want to steal some poet jokes they're on page three.
I also enjoyed admin's mild and fruitless efforts to steer the thread back on track.
But I was glad to make it to the end for this snippet from Leanne (the post she's responding to is on the bottom of page seven)
Quote:I, too, suggest that you read and dwell upon the various arguments offered in this and several other threads. Incidentally, we are not anonymous. We have names, personalities, interactions and relationships that are absolutely as real as those in our physical domains -- the fact that we do not meet in a coffee house has no bearing on the relevance of our existence or our work here.
Oh, and rowens, I really enjoyed
“like kidney stone skipping generations,”