01-27-2026, 02:02 AM
(01-27-2026, 01:47 AM)milo Wrote:Deep question/s. Hm, i dont know. But i think the main importance could b that it is ”animated”. Dont know if this was what Keith was going for but this is what i could ”read” about it.(01-27-2026, 01:36 AM)Smiley Wrote: Its what i can "Read between the lines", the overall impression i get. Also, the way the author treats this, thing, as if it was something more than "just an object".that is a pretty good observation - it is called transference in this case and it is a great technique that the writer displays masterfully.
Do you think it is important to the poem? Is there anything else you noticed? What do you suppose the point of the whole thing is?
I re-read this piece as im writing and the other thing that came to my mind is the message that things end but live on in our memories..
Even the name indicates this.. hinting it has got a spirit of some kind, a dimension beyond fysical matter - A ghost. Something that still lingers on.

