01-10-2026, 11:50 PM
(01-10-2026, 10:21 PM)milo Wrote:For what it's worth, if your daughter is an artist and still talks to you you're probably doing a great job, but to be an artist is to understand that beauty is worth studying, devoting time to learning color and texture and perspective. The fact that ai can do it without even thinking makes me wonder if it's even worth teaching anymore. No need to learn the different medians to express yourself, the computer can do it for you effortlessly. Maybe it comes down to money ultimately, but I think this cognitive dissonance is worth exploring. I just think there's better ways to do it than by promoting it. I appreciate your time here(01-10-2026, 09:15 PM)CRNDLSM Wrote: For one thing, ai art won't be monetized, by the pigpens standards AI poetry is considered plagiarism. Artists believe ai art steals their art styles in order to 'create'. I could use his prompts and draw new pictures, scan them into a computer and email them, obviously he likes what the ai did so I could use those as references.Oh, it is definitely some sort of cheating. My daughter, who is also an artist, was pretty disgusted with when I showed her. We had a decent argument about it last night. In many ways the cognitive dissonance is the point because this stuff is here and I am not going to put my hands over my eyes and pretend it’s not.
My cognitive dissonance here is watching respectful artists use ai as if it isn't some form of cheating.
Anyways offer still stands
Peanut butter honey banana sandwiches

