01-04-2026, 01:05 AM
Certainly quite a few references and it mostly reminded me that I stated the initial definition of an allusion wrong in that it should be an indirect reference but, no sense patching it up now.
An yes, I think you use for me-ism mostly effectively as I tried to make clear. But there is a balance and I am not saying it is definitely over it, just become noticeable to me. For example, consider the following:
Form me, for me m me me for for for, me for me formeformeformeforme for me me eme mkeme emem eme . . .
Can we agree that is too much for me? Somewhere between that and nothing is probably the perfect balance. I thought you were a little over.
I like the strophe about alcohol. i never get drunk myself but I do drink and I can definitely attest to the joy it brings. Up to a point. Once over it, I cannot do other things I enjoy. but of course, why was Burton build on Trent?
Thanks
An yes, I think you use for me-ism mostly effectively as I tried to make clear. But there is a balance and I am not saying it is definitely over it, just become noticeable to me. For example, consider the following:
Form me, for me m me me for for for, me for me formeformeformeforme for me me eme mkeme emem eme . . .
Can we agree that is too much for me? Somewhere between that and nothing is probably the perfect balance. I thought you were a little over.
I like the strophe about alcohol. i never get drunk myself but I do drink and I can definitely attest to the joy it brings. Up to a point. Once over it, I cannot do other things I enjoy. but of course, why was Burton build on Trent?
Thanks