3 hours ago
(12-19-2025, 02:29 PM)tweetywrites Wrote: I interpret it as a disconnect between what the speaker knows emotionally and what institutions can articulate. There's no way to convey emotions and stories to academic or medical frameworks without losing meaning. May I ask what your intended meaning was?Not sure of the larger meaning, though your interpretation gives me fuel to help revise. Thank you!
busker dateline='[url=tel:1766654208' Wrote: 1766654208[/url]']Thanks! It’s part of a larger narrative-poem, I was stuck on this part and wanted to free write and post it to gauge how “too weird” it was. Your interpretation gives me some directions to consider when revising - still not sure about line breaks in general… I will have to beg a kind soul for a tutorial on some other appropriate place on this forum
It's an engaging bit of story telling, with the line pauses at the right points.
The 'war zone' is interesting. The dough men interpret a problem according to their own experience. They can't imagine it on someone else's terms.
It's not just men/women - the wider interpretation is group A / group B, or even self / others.
I would like to know more about the specifics of the work (blue book / unknown) and the perhaps lesbian lover, but it's not essential.
Excellent poem.
With an apt title - dough men / misdiagnosis

