12-26-2025, 07:57 AM
(12-25-2025, 11:28 PM)milo Wrote:Sure and it's based on how training models work. There's a reason people refer to obvious AI writing as AI slop. It's clean, precise, well-punctuated and empty. In short, it is too safe and derivitive.(12-25-2025, 05:43 PM)Todd Wrote: It could be a fun challenge to make an LLM produce anything but garbage. It is possible though but it will take some work.ok, then let me ask you this, do you believe you, a renowned poetry critic and workshopper would have the ability to explain where the poetry generated by the AI fails?
Thanks
Even in this thought experiment, it would be hard to overcome. I'm confident that any solid poet could edit an AI poem into shape. They could impose their style on it to make it live.
That though, isn't that interesting to me. I'd be interested to see if by imposing a prompt upfront could something be created that we would consider good without editing on a first pass.
That's how I'm approaching this discussion.
The secret of poetry is cruelty.--Jon Anderson
