LLMery

[tun]

The AI has trouble making poems that take the "leaps" beyond the rational. The AI can write my poems in a more clear and rational way.
And the AI can make leaps beyond the rational.
I don't have the extra features to make AI Music and Videos, and I've never attempted to play around with that. They do make good artwork.
As I use AI mostly to arrange my essays in plain and simple terms, I post my essays in The Sewer and what the AI makes of them. I want the AI to mirror what I'm saying. I want it to say what I'm saying in a rational and orderly way. So I have the Artistic Performance, and the AI gives a commentary. This is a way to use AI that doesn't distort any intentions.
The AI doesn't always say what I intended. I don't change what the AI says. The AI said it, not me. Distinctions like that are the subtleties and gaffs and blinds I throw into the works. Note that today is Wednesday the 15th, a day of the Devil.

---

Both/And. Using a particular arbitrary framework. The self and the other is the Sun or Star, according to the source material. And I'm using Stevens' poem about a Supreme Fiction as a model as well. And I'm moving beyond the figurative by experiencing everything as figurative. Again, both/and.

---

"there is a war between the mind
And sky, between thought and day and night. It is
For that the poet is always in the sun,

Patches the moon together in his room
To his Virgilian cadences, up down,
Up down. It is a war that never ends.

Yet it depends on yours. The two are one.
They are a plural, a right and left, a pair,
Two parallels that meet if only in

The meeting of their shadows or that meet
In a book"

---

You can say that I'm incorrect. I say that I'm using creative misprision. You can say that I'm a hoarder, I say that I'm an animist.
The "trick" is: I'm an animist and a hoarder.

Why do you keep saying over and again about what 'you' are? I mean it is as if you you don't know - or you keep forgetting - because you keep going back to declaring about what you are.