My name is Felicity Bloodcock.

[tun]

I can and will respond whether you respond or not. I may do it in private or behind your back. In any event, I will. And you will be an affective-quality stimulus in what appears to be memory. Not your poems. Your poems are different. They are similar enough to each other to be a style. They are stylish enough to have a niche interest. People who use culture, or culture uses them, as a broader memory, won't remember these poems. A niche would. Whether or not cultural people have good or bad taste, their judgment is what is either destroyed or played with to advance interest in poems.

I don't know why you would talk at me like this. I am not interested in people. I care nothing for them. What I am getting is that you are saying that you depend exclusively and entirely upon a recieved convention and technique that involves arbitrary moral limits and that you cannot concieve of a manner that does not do that. That explains why you are at pains to describe/situate it inappropriately.