02-16-2023, 10:56 AM
(02-16-2023, 12:36 AM)TranquillityBase Wrote:It is ironic that the most common suggestion when first learning to write poetry or write in general is to read and imitate. I guess the next step is when the student goes beyond the teacher. I was frustrated that the author didn't make the sonnet the AI generated available. I thought that was odd and made my cynical side wonder if it wasn't a ruse or at least exaggerated for effect.(02-14-2023, 10:34 AM)brynmawr1 Wrote: Thanks for sharing the article. The author makes a good point at the end. The original poem I posted wasn't great but it was far from bad which I think is the point. It's likely that if the poem was mixed with a group of poems of similar style it might be hard to determine which was written by AI. AI will only get better, and quickly.What I found most interesting was how AI "learns" to write poetry. Not at all what I was expecting. Basically the same way humans do, by reading.
I am very curious about the book of poems mentioned towards the end, Travesty Generator. I wish I could find an example of what she did, but it seems one has to buy the book to find out.
I guess the lesson for now is that basic poetry, and life in general, can be formulaic on the surface and easily replicated. I think what humans still have is those leaps that connect the unforeseen connected to bring the new and show how the irrational can be rational, ie poetic. Emotion is a shared, infinitely variable experience.

