12-17-2022, 05:52 AM
(12-17-2022, 05:27 AM)Mark A Becker Wrote:Mark,(12-17-2022, 05:11 AM)brynmawr1 Wrote: So, Mark I did have it critique its own poem. see below:Steve-
Thanks, but the formatting is really hard to follow.
Its critique is rather generic, and conatins elements that appear in so many other critiques.
"The rhyme scheme and structure of the poem are effective in creating a sense of flow and cohesion." bullshit. "flow" is such a critique cliche
"The imagery in the poem is also vivid and descriptive, particularly in the lines 'With words and rhymes, they spun their tales'and 'AI with algorithms, never failing.' more bullshit. What imagery is conveyed in a phrase like "With words and rhymes, they spun their tales" ? And what is really descriptive about those lines?
The "advice" on sound is even worse.
AI can kiss my ass, as a poet and critic, because it advances nothing other than a regurgitation of terms that it's "learned". It's bland, at best.
Mark
Not sure where all the weird formatting stuff came from. Able to clean it up. I agree that it is superficial and it is just regurgitating so not really intelligent yet. One question is can we design something that can actually be specific and offer useful commentary without it being self aware. Then it gets tricky.

