Under the Eucalyptus Tree
#2
In mild to moderate critique, a few notes with generalizations below.

(06-25-2020, 08:45 AM)Introspector Wrote:  weeds hide in the night’s glow,
beneath the scent of eucalyptus.
burning,
like a distant memory,  This first stanza is evocative, and ambiguous: what's burning, weeds or memory?

her hands touch me,  The italicized, then, would be the memory.

she’s a lion                        And this would be the viewpoint's later analysis
prowling the field for prey,

she pulls at my pants,   

I’m an elk            Slight physical problem here:  elks are great big animals.  Does the viewpoint think itself large as well as shocked?
stunned by car beams,

I didn’t want her to touch me,  Interestingly switched to past tense here.  Analysis of the incident is stepping back into the present.

she burned like a forest fire  Looking back from the present in the other voice, too
sucking the air from my chest,

she wanted to play a game,  from force of nature to wicked cat-with-mouse

I stood like a toy soldier 
and she threw me,   More shady ambiguity - what, exactly, stood?  And what was tossed?

don’t tell your parents,  is this the victimizer's own voice, or the viewpoint's warning to self?

I slid like a razor blade
against my skin,  a confusing set of images, for a confusing experience

I was too scared to say something, but not too frightened to make excuses

so she rotted my roots
like weeds,
buried under the eucalyptus tree.  In addition to returning to theme, some fine wordplay suggesting "rut" and he verb to root, colloquially
This may be recounting an incident of premature sexual awakening.  If so, it's notable that the victimizer's sex is specified, but the victim's is not.

Or it could be an early experience now recounted with dissatisfaction, making excuses:  the unreliable storyteller.

On the whole, I think it's quite expressive, though some of the stanzas noted above as ambiguous don't actually quite make sense.  For example, the elk in the car lights:  stunned by revelation, but a massive animal presenting considerable danger to a car and its driver.  The rest of the work insists on the victim's powerlessness; why not a rabbit in the headlights?  Is this a hint, or was the elk chosen for sound and striking image?  If the lady (?) saw she had surprised an elk, wouldn't she try to avoid it?

Memories, especially repressed memories triggered by a scent, might not be well organized; the poem  has that feeling, of the victim(?) talking to him(?)self.  The two voices in that conversation might be kept a bit more separate, each given its own mannerisms, perhaps.

That's all I have - this is a somewhat confusing poem portraying a very confusing train of thought.  It could be made more accessible, but not excessively so.
feedback award Non-practicing atheist
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Under the Eucalyptus Tree - by Introspector - 06-25-2020, 08:45 AM
RE: Under the Eucalyptus Tree - by dukealien - 06-26-2020, 10:12 AM
RE: Under the Eucalyptus Tree - by Exit - 06-27-2020, 01:10 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!