05-11-2010, 09:19 AM
Welcome to the forum! Since Billy already commented on splitting up your lines, I won't comment on that anymore
I think just that one simple thing will do wonders for the piece
I think just that one simple thing will do wonders for the piece (05-10-2010, 09:28 PM)wunderkind Wrote: Not everything has weight, they say. I love this first line. It's a fascinating opener for the readerI liked the idea of this, and your words are chosen very well. Just a minor edit, as Billy said. Thanks for this!
Sounds fly through the air, carelessly spat out.
Venom splatters around the room. Bombs explode, hmm, the beginning of the line is good, but I think you could play around more with the double meaning of the poem's first line, "weight" referring to both how serious the consequence of words are and the second meaning what airy immaterial things words actually are. I'd like some imagery like that... violent and dangerous, but efficient and light (Just a thought)embedding pollysyllabic shrapnel into ears, minds, and hearts.
Their trajectory is not considered, the force with which they are propelled not calibrated.
So whoever deploys them owes no apology to whomever they hit, for there was no thought, and therefore, no intent. Good parting words (for there was no thought, and therefore, no intent), definitely food for thought. I guess what's not too clear in the poem is whether the narrator actually believes this in some level/is making a case for it? Or does the narrator hate the idea?
---
PS. If you can, try your hand at giving some of the others a bit of feedback. If you already have, thanks, can you do some more?
