The Hierarchy of Unrequited Love
#4
i find the argument of the poem fallible. to be in love one has to be loved, you say as much in your closing; therefore a man or women cannot fall in love with someone unless it's reciprocated. To do so would just be infatuation. also, as human beings isn't it inbuilt into us to find a partner. if this is so then wouldn't love be an added bonus in the continuation of the species? it reads well because it's well written as is a lot of your stuff but for me it lacks credibility. as one who has known and does at present know love and as one who at times has been loveless; most of what's said never applied. i found most women loved the chase if not the man. if i'm honest so did i re the women. to quote forest gump; "life is like a box of chocolates" so is love, you never know who until you try them on
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Hierarchy of Unrequited Love - by rowens - 02-23-2019, 05:39 AM
RE: The Hierarchy of Unrequited Love - by busker - 02-23-2019, 05:48 AM
RE: The Hierarchy of Unrequited Love - by billy - 03-02-2019, 12:22 PM
RE: The Hierarchy of Unrequited Love - by rowens - 03-02-2019, 12:43 PM
RE: The Hierarchy of Unrequited Love - by billy - 03-02-2019, 01:51 PM
RE: The Hierarchy of Unrequited Love - by rowens - 03-02-2019, 02:02 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!