12-13-2017, 11:44 PM
(12-13-2017, 11:32 PM)RiverNotch Wrote:well, i can’t argue with that well researched and beautifully crafted rebuttable. you’ve certainly won this thread.(12-13-2017, 11:12 PM)shemthepenman Wrote: “In 2005, the peer-reviewed journal Nature asked scientists to compare Wikipedia's scientific articles to those in Encyclopaedia Britannica—"the most scholarly of encyclopedias," according to its own Wiki page. The comparison resulted in a tie; both references contained four serious errors among the 42 articles analyzed by experts.”lol, Nature
https://www.livescience.com/32950-how-ac...pedia.html
but that’s neither here nor there, i much prefer relying on poets on internet forums for all my scholarly information, anyway.
(xD)
