12-13-2017, 11:12 PM
“In 2005, the peer-reviewed journal Nature asked scientists to compare Wikipedia's scientific articles to those in Encyclopaedia Britannica—"the most scholarly of encyclopedias," according to its own Wiki page. The comparison resulted in a tie; both references contained four serious errors among the 42 articles analyzed by experts.”
https://www.livescience.com/32950-how-ac...pedia.html
but that’s neither here nor there, i much prefer relying on poets on internet forums for all my scholarly information, anyway.
https://www.livescience.com/32950-how-ac...pedia.html
but that’s neither here nor there, i much prefer relying on poets on internet forums for all my scholarly information, anyway.
