09-15-2017, 06:26 AM
(09-15-2017, 03:23 AM)Achebe Wrote:(09-15-2017, 02:55 AM)vagabond Wrote: no need to apologize for competition, i didn´t blame anything. but really, do you think the beautiful (in the way you interpret it) pairs are happier than the ugly ones as a rule? i do not think so. there´s so much more criteria than looks.Happiness is short lived, and therefore exists in every relationship for some time. But broadly (I should write an agony column):
1. Beautiful - beautiful. The alpha-alpha pairing. Goes on for a long time, but because male ageing has relatively fewer downsides, ends in a messy divorce at 55. Still, great while it lasts.
2. Ugly man - beautiful woman: the best combination, as the ugly bloke pulls out all stops to keep his girl happy, and the girl's already made up her mind once, so not complaining.
3. Ugly woman - handsome man: huge insecurity on the part of the woman, or a complete lack of self awareness. Also, the male wrongly thinks he has a free pass to sow his seed in 25 year old Agatha. Doomed.
4. Ugly man - ugly woman: Both think they're hotter than the other. Ego conflicts, but they stay together because neither has any better options.
especially "male aging has relatively fewer downsides" My guess is you're male.
billy wrote:welcome to the site. make it your own, wear it like a well loved slipper and wear it out. ella pleads:please click forum titles for posting guidelines, important threads. New poet? Try Poetic DevicesandWard's Tips