09-14-2017, 12:27 PM
(09-14-2017, 10:48 AM)vagabond Wrote:(09-14-2017, 09:49 AM)QDeathstar Wrote: Love needs beauty more than beauty needs love.i think beauty always is internal, that is it´s created inside the perceiver.
A mother will always love their children, sure, but before there can be children there has to be attraction and that takes beauty. Even if that beauty is seen through 6-pack deep beer googles or lonely desperation.
On the other hand (the left one), there are plenty of hot whores hawking their fresh waxed vaginas on the internet for my personal pleasure. They are beautiful, but i don't love them. Beauty doesn't need love. And please don't bring up some bullshit about abstract beauty on the inside. As that's love, not beauty.
the different beauty ideals (that make up only a small part of beautiful things) on which humans agree are bred into us by instinct or learned in different societies. but that doesn´t matter.. from an individual point of view there is no definition of beauty.
and everything needs love even the whores on the internet.
The question isn't if everything needs love. The question is does beauty need love more. There is a definition of beauty. I saw it in a book once. The fact that beauty exists in different planes for me and you doesn't change the fact that is skin deep and external. Any other definition of beauty is a trick of the mind, an illusion of beauty where love is.
The fact that the mind creates beauty where love is only proves that love needs beauty. On the other hand (again, the left one) i've squeezed one out to many a beautiful lady. Unless your some delusional stalker rarely does beauty trick the mind into creating love. Beauty doesn't need love.